Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206405›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2021

Biosensors Designed for Clinical Applications.

James F Rusling, Robert J Forster

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Multiplexed electrochemical assays for clinical applications.Current opinion in electrochemistry · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

James F RuslingDepartment of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6117-3306
Robert J ForsterSchool of Chemical Sciences, Dublin City University, D9 Dublin, Ireland.
Dublin City University · IEUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

Protein Biomarker Arrays for Personalized Treatment of Prostate CancerR01EB016707 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI RUSLING, JAMES F. · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
Enterprise Ireland Commericalization Award CF-2019-1075-PNIBIB NIH HHS EB016707Science Foundation Ireland 16/RC/3948Univ. of Connecticut Academic Plan Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging and validated biomarkers promise to revolutionize clinical practice, shifting the emphasis away from the management of chronic disease towards prevention, early diagnosis and early intervention. The challenge of detecting these low abundance protein and nucleic acid biomarkers within the clinical context demands the development of highly sensitive, even single molecule, assays that are also capable of selectively measuring a small number of defined analytes in complex samples such as whole blood, interstitial fluid, saliva or urine. Success relies on significant innovations in nanomaterials, bioreceptor engineering, transduction strategies and microfluidics. Primarily using examples from our work, this article discusses some recent advance in the selective and sensitive detection of disease biomarkers, highlights key innovations in sensor materials and identifies issues and challenges that need to be carefully considered especially for researchers entering the field.

Indexed as

biomarkerscancercardiovascular and neurological diseasesclinical analysiselectrochemical sensorselectrochemiluminescenceepilepsymicrofluidicspoint of care

Identifiers

PMID34206405
PMCPMC8301448
OpenAlexW3176794086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.