Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206378›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

REDECA: A Novel Framework to Review Artificial Intelligence and Its Applications in Occupational Safety and Health.

Maryam Pishgar, Salah Fuad Issa, Margaret Sietsema, Preethi Pratap, Houshang Darabi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Sensing Technology Applications in the Mining Industry-A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Lightweight and mobile artificial intelligence and immersive technologies in aviation.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Symmetry and asymmetry in atherosclerosis.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2023
    Review
  14. Occupational Safety and Health Equity Impacts of Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of a Fast Test Based on Biometric Signals to Assess Mental Fatigue at the Workplace-A Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maryam PishgarMechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60609, USA.
Salah Fuad IssaAgricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Margaret SietsemaEnvironmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Preethi PratapEnvironmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Houshang DarabiMechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60609, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7881-6542

Funding

Occupational Safety and Health, ERC, University of Illinois at ChicagoT42OH008672 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BUCHANAN, SUSAN NATHALIE · 2005 to 2025
$32.7M
Pilot Program CoreP30ES027792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Gokhan M. Mutlu, Gail S Prins · 2017 to 2026
$13.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES027792NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe field of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly expanding, with many applications seen routinely in health care, industry, and education, and increasingly in workplaces. Although there is growing evidence of applications of AI in workplaces across all industries to simplify and/or automate tasks there is a limited understanding of the role that AI contributes in addressing occupational safety and health (OSH) concerns.

methodsThis paper introduces a new framework called Risk Evolution, Detection, Evaluation, and Control of Accidents (REDECA) that highlights the role that AI plays in the anticipation and control of exposure risks in a worker's immediate environment. Two hundred and sixty AI papers across five sectors (oil and gas, mining, transportation, construction, and agriculture) were reviewed using the REDECA framework to highlight current applications and gaps in OSH and AI fields.

resultsThe REDECA framework highlighted the unique attributes and research focus of each of the five industrial sectors. The majority of evidence of AI in OSH research within the oil/gas and transportation sectors focused on the development of sensors to detect hazardous situations. In construction the focus was on the use of sensors to detect incidents. The research in the agriculture sector focused on sensors and actuators that removed workers from hazardous conditions. Application of the REDECA framework highlighted AI/OSH strengths and opportunities in various industries and potential areas for collaboration.

conclusionsAs AI applications across industries continue to increase, further exploration of the benefits and challenges of AI applications in OSH is needed to optimally protect worker health, safety and well-being.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceOccupational HealthAccidentsHumansIndustryWorkplaceartificial intelligencefuture of workmachine learning algorithmsoccupational safety and healthrobotic devicessensor devicesworker health and safety

Identifiers

PMID34206378
PMCPMC8296875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.