Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206361›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Internet of Food (IoF), Tailor-Made Metal Oxide Gas Sensors to Support Tea Supply Chain.

Estefanía Núñez-Carmona, Marco Abbatangelo, Veronica Sberveglieri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Estefanía Núñez-CarmonaCNR-IBBR, Institute of Bioscience and Bioresources, Via Madonna del Piano, 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4621-0658
Marco AbbatangeloNano Sensor Systems, NASYS Spin-Off University of Brescia, Brescia, Via Camillo Brozzoni, 9, 25125 Brescia, BS, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5550-3401
Veronica SberveglieriCNR-IBBR, Institute of Bioscience and Bioresources, Via Madonna del Piano, 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5991-9391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tea is the second most consumed beverage, and its aroma, determined by volatile compounds (VOCs) present in leaves or developed during the processing stages, has a great influence on the final quality. The goal of this study is to determine the volatilome of different types of tea to provide a competitive tool in terms of time and costs to recognize and enhance the quality of the product in the food chain. Analyzed samples are representative of the three major types of tea: black, green, and white. VOCs were studied in parallel with different technologies and methods: gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometer and solid phase microextraction (SPME-GC-MS) and a device called small sensor system, (S3). S3 is made up of tailor-made metal oxide gas sensors, whose operating principle is based on the variation of sensor resistance based on volatiloma exposure. The data obtained were processed through multivariate statistics, showing the full file of the pre-established aim. From the results obtained, it is understood how supportive an innovative technology can be, remotely controllable supported by machine learning (IoF), aimed in the future at increasing food safety along the entire production chain, as an early warning system for possible microbiological or chemical contamination.

Indexed as

Volatile Organic CompoundsInternetOdorantsOxidesSolid Phase MicroextractionTeaOxidesTeaVolatile Organic CompoundsGC-MSMOX sensorsS3teavolatiloma

Identifiers

PMID34206361
PMCPMC8272160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.