Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206349›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

A Prediction Model for Severe Complications after Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Patients of 70 Years and Older.

Esteban T D Souwer, Esther Bastiaannet, Ewout W Steyerberg, Jan Willem T Dekker, Willem H Steup, Marije M Hamaker, Dirk J A Sonneveld, Thijs A Burghgraef, Frederiek van den Bos, Johanna E A Portielje

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Esteban T D SouwerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, 2545 AA Den Haag, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0489-7321
Esther BastiaannetDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7787-0122
Jan Willem T DekkerDepartment of Surgery, Reinier De Graaf Gasthuis, 2625 AD Delft, The Netherlands.
Willem H SteupDepartment of Surgery, Haga Hospital, 2545 AA Den Haag, The Netherlands.
Marije M HamakerDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dirk J A SonneveldDepartment of Surgery, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, 1624 NP Hoorn, The Netherlands.
Thijs A BurghgraefDepartment of Surgery, Meander Medisch Centrum, 3813 TZ Amersfoort, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8781-9630
Frederiek van den BosDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johanna E A PortieljeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5169-6306
Leiden University Medical Center · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLHaga Hospital · NLMeander Medisch Centrum · NLReinier de Graaf Hospital · NLWestfriesgasthuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Older patients have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Existing CRC surgical prediction models have not incorporated geriatric predictors, limiting applicability for preoperative decision-making. The objective was to develop and internally validate a predictive model based on preoperative predictors, including geriatric characteristics, for severe postoperative complications after elective surgery for stage I-III CRC in patients ≥70 years. PATIENTS AND

methodsA prospectively collected database contained 1088 consecutive patients from five Dutch hospitals (2014-2017) with 171 severe complications (16%). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used for predictor selection and prediction model building. Internal validation was done using bootstrapping.

resultsA geriatric model that included gender, previous DVT or pulmonary embolism, COPD/asthma/emphysema, rectal cancer, the use of a mobility aid, ADL assistance, previous delirium and polypharmacy showed satisfactory discrimination with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI 0.73-0.64); the AUC for the optimism corrected model was 0.65. Based on these predictors, the eight-item colorectal geriatric model (GerCRC) was developed.

conclusionThe GerCRC is the first prediction model specifically developed for older patients expected to undergo CRC surgery. Combining tumour- and patient-specific predictors, including geriatric predictors, improves outcome prediction in the heterogeneous older population.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerfrailtypostoperative complicationspredictionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID34206349
PMCPMC8268502
OpenAlexW3173455252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.