Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206288›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

SurvCNN: A Discrete Time-to-Event Cancer Survival Estimation Framework Using Image Representations of Omics Data.

Yogesh Kalakoti, Shashank Yadav, Durai Sundar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yogesh KalakotiDAILAB, Department of Biochemical Engineering & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi 110 016, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2192-7887
Shashank YadavDAILAB, Department of Biochemical Engineering & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi 110 016, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5741-3215
Durai SundarDAILAB, Department of Biochemical Engineering & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi 110 016, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utility of multi-omics in personalized therapy and cancer survival analysis has been debated and demonstrated extensively in the recent past. Most of the current methods still suffer from data constraints such as high-dimensionality, unexplained interdependence, and subpar integration methods. Here, we propose SurvCNN, an alternative approach to process multi-omics data with robust computer vision architectures, to predict cancer prognosis for Lung Adenocarcinoma patients. Numerical multi-omics data were transformed into their image representations and fed into a Convolutional Neural network with a discrete-time model to predict survival probabilities. The framework also dichotomized patients into risk subgroups based on their survival probabilities over time. SurvCNN was evaluated on multiple performance metrics and outperformed existing methods with a high degree of confidence. Moreover, comprehensive insights into the relative performance of various combinations of omics datasets were probed. Critical biological processes, pathways and cell types identified from downstream processing of differentially expressed genes suggested that the framework could elucidate elements detrimental to a patient's survival. Such integrative models with high predictive power would have a significant impact and utility in precision oncology.

Indexed as

CNNlung adenocarcinomamachine learningmultiomicssurvival

Identifiers

PMID34206288
PMCPMC8269306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.