Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206261›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

How Researchers, Clinicians and Patient Advocates Can Accelerate Lobular Breast Cancer Research.

Leigh Pate, Christine Desmedt, Otto Metzger, Laurie Burgess Hutcheson, Claire Turner, Siobhán Freeney, Steffi Oesterreich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Engaging Patient Advocates to Reduce Breast Cancer Disparities: Opportunities to Advance Breast Cancer Research and Engagement.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2025: Meeting Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Building advocacy into research.Disease models & mechanisms · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leigh PateLobular Breast Cancer Alliance, Breast Cancer Advocate, Seattle, WA 98117, USA.
Christine DesmedtLaboratory for Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Otto MetzgerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Laurie Burgess HutchesonLobular Breast Cancer Alliance, Plymouth, MA 02360, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3135-5029
Claire TurnerLobular Breast Cancer UK, UK Patient Advocate Representative for European Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium, Manchester, Greater Manchester M32 8PA, UK.
Siobhán FreeneyEuropean Lobular Breast Cancer Consortium, Y25HP26 Dublin, Wexford, Ireland.
Steffi OesterreichDepartment of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer research and therapies have significantly advanced in recent years. However, Invasive Lobular Carcinoma (ILC), the second most common histological type of breast cancer and the sixth most frequently diagnosed cancer of women, has not always benefited from critical analysis, missing opportunities to better understand this important subtype. Recent progress understanding the biological and behavioral differences of ILC demonstrates that it is a unique subtype of breast cancer which can respond differently to common therapies. These new insights have increased interest in researching lobular breast disease. Concurrently, the formation of motivated patient-led advocacy organizations working in partnership with basic, translational and clinical researchers creates new opportunities, including connecting a dispersed patient population to research, encouraging new research funding and connecting patient advocates to researchers to advance common goals. This commentary will explore the unprecedented opportunity to drive multidisciplinary, multicenter and international collaborative research into lobular breast cancer that builds on recent research progress. Collaborative research partnerships that include advocates can result in a better understanding of ILC, identify targeted therapies and refine standard of care therapies that are currently equally applied to all breast cancers, resulting in improvements in the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care for patients with ILC.

Indexed as

advocacybreast cancerductalILCinvasive lobular carcinomalobularpatient advocacyresearch advocacy

Identifiers

PMID34206261
PMCPMC8268486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.