Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206103›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Contrast-Enhanced Black Blood MRI Sequence Is Superior to Conventional T1 Sequence in Automated Detection of Brain Metastases by Convolutional Neural Networks.

Jonathan Kottlors, Simon Geissen, Hannah Jendreizik, Nils Große Hokamp, Philipp Fervers, Lenhard Pennig, Kai Laukamp, Christoph Kabbasch, David Maintz, Marc Schlamann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan KottlorsInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50935 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5021-6895
Simon GeissenDivision of Cardiology, Pneumology, Angiology and Intensive Care, University of Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Hannah JendreizikInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Nils Große HokampInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50935 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-0487
Philipp FerversInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Lenhard PennigInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Kai LaukampInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Christoph KabbaschInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
David MaintzInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Marc SchlamannInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Strasse 62, 50935 Cologne, Germany.
Jan BorggrefeInstitut für Radiologie Neuroradiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Minden University Hospital, Hans-Nolte-Strasse 1, 32429 Minden, Germany.
University Hospital Cologne · DERuhr University Bochum · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundin magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), automated detection of brain metastases with convolutional neural networks (CNN) represents an extraordinary challenge due to small lesions sometimes posing as brain vessels as well as other confounders. Literature reporting high false positive rates when using conventional contrast enhanced (CE) T1 sequences questions their usefulness in clinical routine. CE black blood (BB) sequences may overcome these limitations by suppressing contrast-enhanced structures, thus facilitating lesion detection. This study compared CNN performance in conventional CE T1 and BB sequences and tested for objective improvement of brain lesion detection.

methodswe included a subgroup of 127 consecutive patients, receiving both CE T1 and BB sequences, referred for MRI concerning metastatic spread to the brain. A pretrained CNN was retrained with a customized monolayer classifier using either T1 or BB scans of brain lesions.

resultsCE T1 imaging-based training resulted in an internal validation accuracy of 85.5% vs. 92.3% in BB imaging (

conclusionsdetection of brain lesions with CNN, BB-MRI imaging represents a highly effective input type when compared to conventional CE T1-MRI imaging. Use of BB-MRI can overcome the current limitations for automated brain lesion detection and the objectively excellent performance of our CNN suggests routine usage of BB sequences for radiological analysis.

Indexed as

automated detection of brain metastasesconvolutional neural networksmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID34206103
PMCPMC8230135
OpenAlexW3168264595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.