Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34206008›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Conditional CT Strategy-An Effective Tool to Reduce Negative Appendectomy Rate and the Overuse of the CT.

Raminta Luksaite-Lukste, Ruta Kliokyte, Arturas Samuilis, Eugenijus Jasiunas, Martynas Luksta, Kestutis Strupas, Tomas Poskus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raminta Luksaite-LuksteClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-0545-8806
Ruta KliokyteDepartment of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Vilnius University, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Arturas SamuilisDepartment of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Vilnius University, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Eugenijus JasiunasCentre of Informatics and Development, Vilnius University Hospital, Santara Clinics, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Martynas LukstaClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0001-8023-9908
Kestutis StrupasClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Tomas PoskusClinic of Gastroenterology, Nephrourology and Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, LT-08661 Vilnius, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-6931-6041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA) remains challenging; either computed tomography (CT) is universally used or negative appendectomy rates of up to 30% are reported. Transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) as the first-choice imaging modality might be useful in adult patients to reduce the need for CT scans while maintaining low negative appendectomy (NA) rates. The aim of this study was to report the results of the conditional CT strategy for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. (2) Methods: All patients suspected of acute appendicitis were prospectively registered from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. Data on their clinical, radiological and surgical outcomes are presented. (3) Results: A total of 1855 patients were enrolled in our study: 1206 (65.0%) were women, 649 (35.0%) were men, and the median age was 34 years (IQR, 24.5-51). TUS was performed in 1851 (99.8%) patients, and CT in 463 (25.0%) patients. Appendices were not visualized on TUS in 1320 patients (71.3%). Furthermore, 172 (37.1%) of 463 CTs were diagnosed with AA, 42 (9.1%) CTs revealed alternative emergency diagnosis and 249 (53.8%) CTs were normal. Overall, 519 (28.0%) patients were diagnosed with AA: 464 appendectomies and 27 diagnostic laparoscopies were performed. The NA rate was 4.2%. The sensitivity and specificity for TUS and CT are as follows: 71.4% and 96.2%; 93.8% and 93.6%. (4) Conclusion: A conditional CT strategy is effective in reducing NA rates and avoids unnecessary CT in a large proportion of patients. Observation and repeated TUS might be useful in unclear cases.

Indexed as

acute appendicitisCT scandiagnostic imagingnegative appendectomyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID34206008
PMCPMC8198775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.