Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205959›Full record

ArticleVaccines2021

How Public Health Professionals View Mandatory Vaccination in Italy-A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Erica Pitini, Valentina Baccolini, Annalisa Rosso, Azzurra Massimi, Corrado De Vito, Carolina Marzuillo, Paolo Villari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erica PitiniDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2018-3679
Valentina BaccoliniDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7873-7817
Annalisa RossoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Azzurra MassimiDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Corrado De VitoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Carolina MarzuilloDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Paolo VillariDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, P. le A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy.

Funding

Sapienza Università di Roma RG11715C81FC58AD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the decline in child vaccination coverage and the subsequent occurrence of large vaccine-preventable disease outbreaks, in 2017 Italy introduced a new law that made ten vaccines mandatory for children aged 0-16 years. The policy change initiated an ongoing debate among the general public, as well as in the political arena and the scientific community, over this major public health concern. Hence, we conducted a survey aimed at assessing Italian public health professionals' attitudes towards and opinions on mandatory vaccination. A validated online questionnaire was administered to 1350 members of the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health. Among the 1044 responders (response rate 77%), a large majority were in favour of the Italian mandatory vaccination law (91%) and against its repeal (74%). Nevertheless, according to our sample, maintaining a high level of vaccination coverage without the need to mandate would be preferable, and thus efforts to promote vaccine confidence and proactive vaccine uptake are still needed.

Indexed as

childhood vaccinationmandatory vaccinationpublic health professionalssurvey

Identifiers

PMID34205959
PMCPMC8228801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.