Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205949›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Drone Noise Emission Characteristics and Noise Effects on Humans-A Systematic Review.

Beat Schäffer, Reto Pieren, Kurt Heutschi, Jean Marc Wunderli, Stefan Becker

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
25.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Integrated Evaluation of the Aeroacoustics and Psychoacoustics of a Single Propeller.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. A Method to Measure and Model Acoustic Emissions of Multicopters.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Requirements for Drone Operations to Minimise Community Noise Impact.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Investigation of Metrics for Assessing Human Response to Drone Noise.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  14. Envisioning social drones in education.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Beat SchäfferEmpa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1805-4117
Reto PierenEmpa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5280-2230
Kurt HeutschiEmpa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2700-8179
Jean Marc WunderliEmpa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5956-8229
Stefan BeckerBeSB GmbH Berlin Schalltechnisches Büro, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology · CHBerlin Schalltechnisches Büro · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of operations of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), commonly referred to as "drones", has strongly increased in the past and is likely to further grow in the future. Therefore, drones are becoming a growing new source of environmental noise pollution, and annoyance reactions to drone noise are likely to occur in an increasing share of the population. To date, research on drone noise emission characteristics, and in particular also on health impacts, seems scarce, but systematic overviews on these topics are missing. The objective of this study was to establish a systematic literature review on drone noise emissions and noise effects on humans. The paper presents the methodology of the systematic reviews performed separately for noise emission and noise effects, assembles current literature, gives an overview on the state of knowledge, and identifies research gaps. Current literature suggests that drone noise is substantially more annoying than road traffic or aircraft noise due to special acoustic characteristics such as pure tones and high-frequency broadband noise. A range of open questions remains to be tackled by future studies.

Indexed as

AircraftNoiseAcousticsHumansannoyancedronesmulticopternoise effectsnoise emissionperceptionUASUAV

Identifiers

PMID34205949
PMCPMC8198898
OpenAlexW3171056593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.