Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205877›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Foveal Pit Morphology Characterization: A Quantitative Analysis of the Key Methodological Steps.

David Romero-Bascones, Maitane Barrenechea, Ane Murueta-Goyena, Marta Galdós, Juan Carlos Gómez-Esteban, Iñigo Gabilondo, Unai Ayala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David Romero-BasconesBiomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering (MU-ENG), Mondragon Unibertsitatea, 20500 Mondragón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5394-2892
Maitane BarrenecheaBiomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering (MU-ENG), Mondragon Unibertsitatea, 20500 Mondragón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-6944
Ane Murueta-GoyenaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Nursery, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 48940 Leioa, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9808-6943
Marta GaldósOphthalmology Department, Cruces University Hospital, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4422-2038
Juan Carlos Gómez-EstebanNeurodegenerative Disease Research Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4697-3890
Iñigo GabilondoNeurodegenerative Disease Research Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, 48903 Barakaldo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6045-2840
Unai AyalaBiomedical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering (MU-ENG), Mondragon Unibertsitatea, 20500 Mondragón, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1079-752X

Funding

Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research BIO17/ND/010Department of Health of the Basque Government 2016111009Department of Health of the Basque Government 2020333033Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI16/00005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disentangling the cellular anatomy that gives rise to human visual perception is one of the main challenges of ophthalmology. Of particular interest is the foveal pit, a concave depression located at the center of the retina that captures light from the gaze center. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in studying the morphology of the foveal pit by extracting geometrical features from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images. Despite this, research has devoted little attention to comparing existing approaches for two key methodological steps: the location of the foveal center and the mathematical modelling of the foveal pit. Building upon a dataset of 185 healthy subjects imaged twice, in the present paper the image alignment accuracy of four different foveal center location methods is studied in the first place. Secondly, state-of-the-art foveal pit mathematical models are compared in terms of fitting error, repeatability, and bias. The results indicate the importance of using a robust foveal center location method to align images. Moreover, we show that foveal pit models can improve the agreement between different acquisition protocols. Nevertheless, they can also introduce important biases in the parameter estimates that should be considered.

Indexed as

foveaoptical coherence tomographyretinaretinal imaging

Identifiers

PMID34205877
PMCPMC8227188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.