Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205827›Full record

ReviewPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2021

cfDNA Sequencing: Technological Approaches and Bioinformatic Issues.

Elodie Bohers, Pierre-Julien Viailly, Fabrice Jardin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review of ctDNA in breast cancer - present utility and future perspectives.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Update on Liquid Biopsy.Radiology · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elodie BohersINSERM U1245, Henri Becquerel Center, IRIB, Normandy University, 76000 Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9168-576X
Pierre-Julien ViaillyINSERM U1245, Henri Becquerel Center, IRIB, Normandy University, 76000 Rouen, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9636-8971
Fabrice JardinINSERM U1245, Henri Becquerel Center, IRIB, Normandy University, 76000 Rouen, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the era of precision medicine, it is crucial to identify molecular alterations that will guide the therapeutic management of patients. In this context, circulating tumoral DNA (ctDNA) released by the tumor in body fluids, like blood, and carrying its molecular characteristics is becoming a powerful biomarker for non-invasive detection and monitoring of cancer. Major recent technological advances, especially in terms of sequencing, have made possible its analysis, the challenge still being its reliable early detection. Different parameters, from the pre-analytical phase to the choice of sequencing technology and bioinformatic tools can influence the sensitivity of ctDNA detection.

Indexed as

bioinformaticscell-free DNAcirculating tumoral DNAsequencing technologies

Identifiers

PMID34205827
PMCPMC8234829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.