Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205743›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Seafarers' Perception and Attitudes towards Noise Emission on Board Ships.

Luka Vukić, Vice Mihanović, Luca Fredianelli, Veljko Plazibat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Subjective assessment of working conditions on watercrafts.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Analysis and Acoustic Event Classification of Environmental Data Collected in a Citizen Science Project.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New Indicators for the Assessment and Prevention of Noise Nuisance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Hearing Impairment in French Merchant Seafarers: Retrospective Study on Data from 8308 Audiometric Tests.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perception of National Park Soundscape and Its Effects on Visual Aesthetics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluating the Impact of Metro Interior Noise on Passenger Annoyance: An Experimental Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Effects of Exposure to Road, Railway, Airport and Recreational Noise on Blood Pressure and Hypertension.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luka VukićDepartment for Maritime Management Technologies, Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Split, Ruđera Boškovića 37, 21000 Split, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-7543-7798
Vice MihanovićPort Authority Split, Gat Svetog Duje 1, 21000 Split, Croatia.
Luca FredianelliPhysics Department, University of Pisa, Largo Bruno Pontecorvo 3, 56127 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6575-9040
Veljko PlazibatDepartment for Maritime Management Technologies, Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Split, Ruđera Boškovića 37, 21000 Split, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noise has long been neglected as an environmental pollutant and impairment health factor in maritime transport. Recently, acoustic pollution indicates the highest growth in transport external cost unit values. In 2020, questionnaires were submitted to seafarers to examine their noise exposure and perception on board and attitudes towards noise abatement measures. Responses of 189 participants were processed using descriptive statistics and Likert scale valuation, while their consistency was tested with indirect indicators using linear regression and correlation test. Results show that more than 40% of respondents do not consider noise as a significant environmental problem. The negative perception among respondents with ≥10 years of work experience was much lower (23.53%). Most are aware of the onboard noise harmful effects that can influence their health. Despite that, they use personal protection equipment only sometimes. A higher positive perception was recorded in groups of respondents with a university degree (90%), work experience longer than ten years (82.35%), and monthly income higher than 4000 € (70%). Respondents are not strongly motivated to participate in funding noise mitigation measures, and such a viewpoint is not related to their monthly incomes. The low awareness and motivation regarding acoustic pollution generally shown by the surveyed seafarers should be watched as a threat by the company managers. Better education and awareness are likely to be crucial to change the current state of affairs.

Indexed as

Naval MedicineOccupational HealthAttitudeHumansPerceptionShipsSurveys and Questionnairesacoustic pollutionenvironmental pollutionhealth impactnoise onboard shipnoise surveyseafarers

Identifiers

PMID34205743
PMCPMC8296330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.