Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205610›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Coffee Disease Visualization and Classification.

Milkisa Yebasse, Birhanu Shimelis, Henok Warku, Jaepil Ko, Kyung Joo Cheoi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Salt Stress in Plants and Mitigation Approaches.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Milkisa YebasseDepartment of Computer Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39177, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9435-5026
Birhanu ShimelisArtificial Intelligence Center (AIC), Addis Ababa 2Q92+88, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-4857-2262
Henok WarkuDepartment of IT-Bio Convergence System, Electronics Engineering, Graduate School, Chosun University, Gwangju 61452, Korea.
Jaepil KoDepartment of Computer Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39177, Korea.
Kyung Joo CheoiDepartment of Computer Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2076-9119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning architectures are widely used in state-of-the-art image classification tasks. Deep learning has enhanced the ability to automatically detect and classify plant diseases. However, in practice, disease classification problems are treated as black-box methods. Thus, it is difficult to trust the model that it truly identifies the region of the disease in the image; it may simply use unrelated surroundings for classification. Visualization techniques can help determine important areas for the model by highlighting the region responsible for the classification. In this study, we present a methodology for visualizing coffee diseases using different visualization approaches. Our goal is to visualize aspects of a coffee disease to obtain insight into what the model "sees" as it learns to classify healthy and non-healthy images. In addition, visualization helped us identify misclassifications and led us to propose a guided approach for coffee disease classification. The guided approach achieved a classification accuracy of 98% compared to the 77% of naïve approach on the Robusta coffee leaf image dataset. The visualization methods considered in this study were Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, and Score-CAM. We also provided a visual comparison of the visualization methods.

Indexed as

coffee disease classificationcoffee disease visualizationdeep learningGrad-CAMScore-CAM

Identifiers

PMID34205610
PMCPMC8235481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.