Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205553›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Comparison of Joint Effect of Acute and Chronic Toxicity for Combined Assessment of Heavy Metals on

Nur Adila Adnan, Mohd Izuan Effendi Halmi, Siti Salwa Abd Gani, Uswatun Hasanah Zaidan, Mohd Yunus Abd Shukor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Environmental Impact Assessment by Green Processes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nur Adila AdnanDepartment of Land Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Izuan Effendi HalmiDepartment of Land Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Siti Salwa Abd GaniDepartment of Agricultural Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-511X
Uswatun Hasanah ZaidanDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Yunus Abd ShukorDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-6150-2114
Universiti Putra Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting the crucial effect of single metal pollutants against the aquatic ecosystem has been highly debatable for decades. However, dealing with complex metal mixtures management in toxicological studies creates a challenge, as heavy metals may evoke greater toxicity on interactions with other constituents rather than individually low acting concentrations. Moreover, the toxicity mechanisms are different between short term and long term exposure of the metal toxicant. In this study, acute and chronic toxicity based on luminescence inhibition assay using newly isolated

Indexed as

MercuryMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, ChemicalEcosystemPhotobacteriumMercuryMetals, HeavyWater Pollutants, Chemicalacute and chronic toxicityluminescent bacteriatoxicity assessment

Identifiers

PMID34205553
PMCPMC8296520
OpenAlexW3174524186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.