Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205335›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Relating Biomechanics and Prognosis.

Benjamin M MacCurtain, Ned P Quirke, Stephen D Thorpe, Tom K Gallagher

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin M MacCurtainDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-4534-2795
Ned P QuirkeUCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8131-8472
Stephen D ThorpeUCD School of Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-4707-7756
Tom K GallagherDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland.
St. Vincent's University Hospital · IEUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common form of pancreatic cancer and carries a dismal prognosis. Resectable patients are treated predominantly with surgery while borderline resectable patients may receive neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) to downstage their disease prior to possible resection. PDAC tissue is stiffer than healthy pancreas, and tissue stiffness is associated with cancer progression. Another feature of PDAC is increased tissue heterogeneity. We postulate that tumour stiffness and heterogeneity may be used alongside currently employed diagnostics to better predict prognosis and response to treatment. In this review we summarise the biomechanical changes observed in PDAC, explore the factors behind these changes and describe the clinical consequences. We identify methods available for assessing PDAC biomechanics ex vivo and in vivo, outlining the relative merits of each. Finally, we discuss the potential use of radiological imaging for prognostic use.

Indexed as

biomechanicselastographyendoscopic ultrasoundextracellular matrix (ECM)magnetic resonance elastographyneoadjuvant therapypancreatic cancerpancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)tissue mechanicstumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID34205335
PMCPMC8234178
OpenAlexW3173821187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.