Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205332›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Interview and Physical Examination in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis as the Cause of Chronic Pelvic Pain.

Jolanta Nawrocka-Rutkowska, Iwona Szydłowska, Aleksandra Rył, Sylwester Ciećwież, Magdalena Ptak, Andrzej Starczewski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Awareness of Endometriosis Symptoms-A Cross Sectional Survey among Polish Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jolanta Nawrocka-RutkowskaDepartment of Gynecology, Endocrinology and Gynecological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-256 Szczecin, Poland.
Iwona SzydłowskaDepartment of Gynecology, Endocrinology and Gynecological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-256 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1518-8838
Aleksandra RyłDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation and Clinical Physiotherapy, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5954-4489
Sylwester CiećwieżDepartment of Gynecology, Endocrinology and Gynecological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-256 Szczecin, Poland.
Magdalena PtakDepartment of Medical Rehabilitation and Clinical Physiotherapy, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6930-0579
Andrzej StarczewskiDepartment of Gynecology, Endocrinology and Gynecological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, 71-256 Szczecin, Poland.
Pomeranian Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pelvic pain affects approximately 15% of reproductive age women. It is mainly caused by adhesions (20-40%). Despite CPP being the main symptom of endometriosis, the disease is confirmed by laparoscopy only in 12-18% of cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of laparoscopy in women with CCP and to assess the sensitivity and specificity of elements of an interview and clinical examination. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included 148 women with CPP. Each patient underwent laparoscopy. In laparoscopy, the presence of endometriosis and/or peritoneal adhesions was confirmed. Then, the sensitivity and specificity and the positive and negative predictive value of endometriosis symptoms or abnormalities in the gynecological examination were statistically calculated.

resultsAfter previous surgery, adhesions were found in almost half (47%) of patients. In patients without a history of surgery, adhesions were diagnosed in 6.34% of patients. Endometriosis without coexisting adhesions was more often diagnosed in women without previous surgery (34.9%), compared to 10.58% in the group with a history of surgery (

conclusionsIntraperitoneal adhesions are most common in women after pelvic surgery and with chronic ailments. The best results for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of endometriosis are found in women with irregular menstruations during which the pain increases. Laparoscopy still remains the primary diagnostic and therapeutic method for these women.

Indexed as

EndometriosisLaparoscopyFemaleHumansPelvic PainPhysical ExaminationTissue Adhesionschronic pelvic painendometriosislaparoscopypelvic adhesions

Identifiers

PMID34205332
PMCPMC8296507
OpenAlexW3176947561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.