Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205317›Full record

ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2021

Electrical Stimulation to Enhance Wound Healing.

Saranya B Rajendran, Kirsty Challen, Karen L Wright, John G Hardy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. A Soft, Flexible Implant for Wireless Photothermal-Pyroelectric Neurostimulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advances in electrical stimulation for wound healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  20. Electrical stimulation: a novel adjunct therapy for diabetic foot ulcers.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Saranya B RajendranLancaster Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire LA1 4AT, UK.
Kirsty ChallenEmergency Department, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, Preston, Lancashire PR2 9HT, UK.
Karen L WrightDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire LA1 4YG, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0040-9247
John G HardyDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire LA1 4YB, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0655-2167
Lancaster University · GBRoyal Preston Hospital · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L013819/1Medical Research Council MC_PC_17192Royal Society of Chemistry RM1601-2703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical stimulation (ES) can serve as a therapeutic modality accelerating the healing of wounds, particularly chronic wounds which have impaired healing due to complications from underlying pathology. This review explores how ES affects the cellular mechanisms of wound healing, and its effectiveness in treating acute and chronic wounds. Literature searches with no publication date restrictions were conducted using the Cochrane Library, Medline, Web of Science, Google Scholar and PubMed databases, and 30 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria. In vitro and in vivo experiments investigating the effect of ES on the general mechanisms of healing demonstrated increased epithelialization, fibroblast migration, and vascularity around wounds. Six in vitro studies demonstrated bactericidal effects upon exposure to alternating and pulsed current. Twelve randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigated the effect of pulsed current on chronic wound healing. All reviewed RCTs demonstrated a larger reduction in wound size and increased healing rate when compared to control groups. In conclusion, ES therapy can contribute to improved chronic wound healing and potentially reduce the financial burden associated with wound management. However, the variations in the wound characteristics, patient demographics, and ES parameters used across studies present opportunities for systematic RCT studies in the future.

Indexed as

cell biologychronic woundselectrical stimulationwound healing

Identifiers

PMID34205317
PMCPMC8293212
OpenAlexW3175589029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.