ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Machine Learning Strategy for Soil Nutrients Prediction Using Spectroscopic Method.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- Agrimind intelligent deep learning framework for accurate soil fertility prediction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predicting soil organic carbon with ensemble learning techniques by using satellite images for precision farming.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating IoT for Soil Monitoring and Hybrid Machine Learning in Predicting Tomato Crop Disease in a Typical South India Station.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Low-Cost Optical Sensors for Soil Composition Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Estimation of Soil Characteristics from Multispectral Sentinel-3 Imagery and DEM Derivatives Using Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Enhanced reptile search optimization with convolutional autoencoder for soil nutrient classification model.PeerJ · 2023Article
- Assessment of Soil Fertility Using Induced Fluorescence and Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Salt Stress in Plants and Mitigation Approaches.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- DA-PAA: A spectral compression method combined with two-dimensional encoding for predicting soil nutrient.Science progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The research presented in this paper is based on the hypothesis that the machine learning approach improves the accuracy of soil properties prediction. The correlations obtained in this research are important for understanding the overall strategy for soil properties prediction using optical spectroscopy sensors. Several research results have been stated and investigated. A comparison is made between six commonly used techniques: Random Forest, Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, Least-Square Support Vector Machine and Artificial Neural Network, showing that the best prediction accuracy cannot always be achieved by the most common and complicated method. The influence of the chosen category for nutrient characterization was investigated, indicating better prediction when a multi-component strategy was used. In contrast, the prediction of single-component soil properties was less accurate. In addition, the influence of category levels was not as significant as expected when choosing between 3-level, 5-level or 13-level nutrient characterization for some nutrients, which can be used for a more precise nutrient characterization strategy. A comparative analysis was performed between soil from a local farm with similar texture and soils collected from different locations in Slovenia, which gave a better prediction for a local farm. Finally, the influence of principal component analysis was validated using 5, 10, 20 and 50 first principal components, indicating the better performance of machine learning when using the 50 principal components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.