Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205275›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Implementation of Gender Identity and Assigned Sex at Birth Data Collection in Electronic Health Records: Where Are We Now?

Hale M Thompson, Clair A Kronk, Ketzel Feasley, Paul Pachwicewicz, Niranjan S Karnik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identifying and Characterizing the Transgender and Nonbinary Population Presenting to Pediatric Psychiatry Emergency Services.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  9. Database quality assessment in research in paramedicine: a scoping review.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Informatics and data science approaches address significant public health problems.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  13. Words matter: The language of difference in human genetics.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2023
    Article
  14. Transgender Individuals and Digital Health.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Pediatric sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in the electronic health record.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hale M ThompsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9704-934X
Clair A KronkDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
Ketzel FeasleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Paul PachwicewiczDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Niranjan S KarnikDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7650-3008

Funding

UCLA Implementation Science and Substance Use Research and Education (ISSURE) ProgramR25DA035692 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TIMOTHY W FONG, GAIL E. WYATT · 2013 to 2026
$3.9M
PA-20-072: Supplement to A Chicago Center of Excellence in Learning Health Systems Research Training (ACCELERAT)K12HS026385 · AHRQ · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI FRANKLIN, PATRICIA D, KHO, ABEL N. · 2018 to 2022
$3.4M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS026385NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA035692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2015, the United States Department of Health and Human Services instantiated rules mandating the inclusion of sexual orientation and gender identity (SO/GI) data fields for systems certified under Stage 3 of the Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records (EHR) program. To date, no published assessments have benchmarked implementation penetration and data quality. To establish a benchmark for a U.S. health system collection of gender identity and sex assigned at birth, we analyzed one urban academic health center's EHR data; specifically, the records of patients with unplanned hospital admissions during 2020 (N = 49,314). Approximately one-quarter of patient records included gender identity data, and one percent of them indicated a transgender or nonbinary (TGNB) status. Data quality checks suggested limited provider literacy around gender identity as well as limited provider and patient comfort levels with gender identity disclosures. Improvements are needed in both provider and patient literacy and comfort around gender identity in clinical settings. To include TGNB populations in informatics-based research, additional novel approaches, such as natural language processing, may be needed for more comprehensive and representative TGNB cohort discovery. Community and stakeholder engagement around gender identity data collection and health research will likely improve these implementation efforts.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityTransgender PersonsAdolescentAdultChildData CollectionElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleSexual BehaviorYoung Adultclinical informaticsnonbinarypopulation healthSO/GI datatransgender health disparities

Identifiers

PMID34205275
PMCPMC8296460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.