Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34205015›Full record

ArticleMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2021

A Five-Year Survey for Plastic Surgery Malpractice Claims in Rome, Italy.

Alessandro Feola, Chiara Minotti, Daniela Marchetti, Marco Caricato, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Luigi Tonino Marsella, Giuseppe La Monaca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandro FeolaDepartment of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via Luciano Armanni 5, 80138 Napoli, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9666-2636
Chiara MinottiBioethics and Humanities Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8616-5065
Daniela MarchettiSafety and Bioethics Department, Section of Legal Medicine, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Fondazione Policlinico "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Roma, Italy.
Marco CaricatoColorectal Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5610-1615
Gabriella Teresa CapolupoColorectal Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6009-8180
Luigi Tonino MarsellaDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00155 Roma, Italy.
Giuseppe La MonacaBioethics and Humanities Research Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9855-1657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Introduction: Medical malpractice claims against both health institutions and physicians are a crucial topic in Italy, as well as in other countries, particularly regarding civil proceedings. Our study reports an analysis of all of the malpractice judgments concerning plastic surgery decided in the Civil Court of Rome between 2012 and 2016. (2) Methods: the database of the Observatory Project on Medical Responsibility (ORMe) was analyzed, which collects all of the judgments of the Civil Court of Rome, that is, the first instance district court. Therefore, neither the jurisprudence of the second level court nor that of the Supreme Court was taken into account. (3) Results: 144 judgments concerning plastic surgery were delivered in the five-year period of 2012-2016 (corresponding to 10.6% of total professional liability verdicts of the Civil Court of Rome in the same period). In 101/144 cases (70.14%), the claim was accepted. A total of €4,727,579.00 was paid in compensation for plastic surgery malpractice claims, with a range from a minimum amount of €1555.96 to a maximum amount of €1,425,155.00 and an average compensation of €46,807.71 per claim that was significantly lower compared to other surgical disciplines. (4) Conclusions: Our data confirm that the analyzed branch has a high litigation rate, with a prevalence of convictions for cosmetic procedures over reconstructive ones, both for malpractice and for violation of the informed consent. Plastic surgery is also confirmed among those branches in which the professionals are more frequently sued compared to health institutions.

Indexed as

MalpracticeSurgery, PlasticHumansItalyLiability, LegalRomemedical jurisprudencemedical liabilityplastic surgery

Identifiers

PMID34205015
PMCPMC8230183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.