Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204904›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Blurring the Boundaries between a Branch and a Flower: Potential Developmental Venues in CACTACEAE.

Isaura Rosas-Reinhold, Alma Piñeyro-Nelson, Ulises Rosas, Salvador Arias

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isaura Rosas-ReinholdInstituto de Biología, Jardín Botánico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México C.P.04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5397-0666
Alma Piñeyro-NelsonDepartamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Ciudad de México C.P.04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7349-0096
Ulises RosasInstituto de Biología, Jardín Botánico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México C.P.04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5088-2679
Salvador AriasInstituto de Biología, Jardín Botánico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México C.P.04510, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7674-7050

Funding

CONACYT 2018-000012-01NACFCONACYT A1-S-43879PAPIIT-DGAPA-UNAM IN208619PAPIIT-DGAPA-UNAM IN211319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flowers are defined as short shoots that carry reproductive organs. In Cactaceae, this term acquires another meaning, since the flower is interpreted as a branch with a perianth at the tip, with all reproductive organs embedded within the branch, thus giving way to a structure that has been called a "flower shoot". These organs have long attracted the attention of botanists and cactologists; however, the understanding of the morphogenetic processes during the development of these structures is far from clear. In this review, we present and discuss some classic flower concepts used to define floral structures in Cactaceae in the context of current advances in flower developmental genetics and evolution. Finally, we propose several hypotheses to explain the origin of these floral shoot structures in cacti, and we suggest future research approaches and methods that could be used to fill the gaps in our knowledge regarding the ontogenetic origin of the "flower" in the cactus family.

Indexed as

cacti evolutionevo-devofloral shootflower developmentflower evolutionflower organ identity

Identifiers

PMID34204904
PMCPMC8228900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.