Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204864›Full record

ArticleClocks & sleep2021

Trait Interindividual Differences in the Magnitude of Subjective Sleepiness from Sleep Inertia.

Kirsie R Lundholm, Kimberly A Honn, Lillian Skeiky, Rachael A Muck, Hans P A Van Dongen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clocks & sleep, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomathematical modeling of fatigue due to sleep inertia.Journal of theoretical biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A preliminary framework for managing sleep inertia in occupational settings.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2023
    Review
  9. The Psychomotor Vigilance Test as a measure of alertness and sleep inertia in people with central disorders of hypersomnolence.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kirsie R LundholmSleep and Performance Research Center & Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8191-2508
Kimberly A HonnSleep and Performance Research Center & Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
Lillian SkeikySleep and Performance Research Center & Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
Rachael A MuckSleep and Performance Research Center & Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.
Hans P A Van DongenSleep and Performance Research Center & Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-2971

Funding

Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs W81XWH-20-1-0442NASA Headquarters NAG9-1161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In shift work settings and on-call operations, workers may be at risk of sleep inertia when called to action immediately after awakening from sleep. However, individuals may differ substantially in their susceptibility to sleep inertia. We investigated this using data from a laboratory study in which 20 healthy young adults were each exposed to 36 h of total sleep deprivation, preceded by a baseline sleep period and followed by a recovery sleep period, on three separate occasions. In the week prior to each laboratory session and on the corresponding baseline night in the laboratory, participants either extended their sleep period to 12 h/day or restricted it to 6 h/day. During periods of wakefulness in the laboratory, starting right after scheduled awakening, participants completed neurobehavioral tests every 2 h. Testing included the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale to measure subjective sleepiness, for which the data were analyzed with nonlinear mixed-effects regression to quantify sleep inertia. This revealed considerable interindividual differences in the magnitude of sleep inertia, which were highly stable within individuals after both baseline and recovery sleep periods, regardless of study condition. Our results demonstrate that interindividual differences in subjective sleepiness due to sleep inertia are substantial and constitute a trait.

Indexed as

human phenotypeintraclass correlation coefficientKarolinska Sleepiness Scalenonlinear mixed-effects modelingon-call workrecovery sleepsleep extensionsleep restriction

Identifiers

PMID34204864
PMCPMC8293243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.