Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204832›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Proteome Profiling of PMJ2-R and Primary Peritoneal Macrophages.

Alexander L Rusanov, Peter M Kozhin, Olga V Tikhonova, Victor G Zgoda, Dmitry S Loginov, Adéla Chlastáková, Martin Selinger, Jan Sterba, Libor Grubhoffer, Nataliya G Luzgina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Modulation of Macrophages TLR4-Mediated Transcriptional Response byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexander L RusanovV. N. Orekhovich Research Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaja Str. 10, 119121 Moscow, Russia.
Peter M KozhinV. N. Orekhovich Research Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaja Str. 10, 119121 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9989-9778
Olga V TikhonovaV. N. Orekhovich Research Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaja Str. 10, 119121 Moscow, Russia.
Victor G ZgodaV. N. Orekhovich Research Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaja Str. 10, 119121 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4532-4274
Dmitry S LoginovV. N. Orekhovich Research Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaja Str. 10, 119121 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4164-6145
Adéla ChlastákováFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-0277-140X
Martin SelingerFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Jan SterbaFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-1005-1787
Libor GrubhofferFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Nataliya G LuzginaV. N. Orekhovich Research Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaja Str. 10, 119121 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

the framework of the Russian Federation fundamental research program for the long-term period for 2021-2030» and also supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation agreement #14.616.21.0094, unique identifier RFMEFI61618X0094the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic INTER-ACTION project LTARF 18021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro models are often used for studying macrophage functions, including the process of phagocytosis. The application of primary macrophages has limitations associated with the individual characteristics of animals, which can lead to insufficient standardization and higher variability of the obtained results. Immortalized cell lines do not have these disadvantages, but their responses to various signals can differ from those of the living organism. In the present study, a comparative proteomic analysis of immortalized PMJ2-R cell line and primary peritoneal macrophages isolated from C57BL/6 mice was performed. A total of 4005 proteins were identified, of which 797 were quantified. Obtained results indicate significant differences in the abundances of many proteins, including essential proteins associated with the process of phagocytosis, such as Elmo1, Gsn, Hspa8, Itgb1, Ncf2, Rac2, Rack1, Sirpa, Sod1, C3, and Msr1. These findings indicate that outcomes of studies utilizing PMJ2-R cells as a model of peritoneal macrophages should be carefully validated. All MS data are deposited in ProteomeXchange with the identifier PXD022133.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAnimalsCells, CulturedDown-RegulationGene OntologyMacrophages, PeritonealMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhagocytosisProtein Interaction MapsProteomeUp-RegulationProteomeLC-MS/MSperitoneal macrophagesphagocytosisPMJ2-Rproteome

Identifiers

PMID34204832
PMCPMC8231560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.