Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204826›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Evaluation of Cytotoxic and Mutagenic Effects of the Synthetic Cathinones Mexedrone, α-PVP and α-PHP.

Monia Lenzi, Veronica Cocchi, Sofia Gasperini, Raffaella Arfè, Matteo Marti, Patrizia Hrelia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genotoxicity Evaluation of The Novel Psychoactive Substance MTTA.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Insights on New Psychoactive Substances (NPSs).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monia LenziDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Veronica CocchiDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0958-3615
Sofia GasperiniDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Raffaella ArfèSection of Legal Medicine and LTTA Centre, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8415-3711
Matteo MartiSection of Legal Medicine and LTTA Centre, Department of Translational Medicine, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Patrizia HreliaDepartment of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITUniversity of Ferrara · IT

Funding

Anti-Drug Policies Department, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Italy Effects of NPS: development of a multicentre research for the information enhancement of the Early Warning SystemUniversità degli Studi di Ferrara FAR 2019 to MMUniversità degli Studi di Ferrara FAR 2020 to MM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mexedrone, α-PVP and α-PHP are synthetic cathinones. They can be considered amphetamine-like substances with a stimulating effect. Actually, studies showing their impact on DNA are totally absent. Therefore, in order to fill this gap, aim of the present work was to evaluate their mutagenicity on TK6 cells. On the basis of cytotoxicity and cytostasis results, we selected the concentrations (35-100 µM) to be used in the further analysis. We used the micronucleus (MN) as indicator of genetic damage and analyzed the MNi frequency fold increase by flow cytometry. Mexedrone demonstrated its mutagenic potential contrary to the other two compounds; we then proceeded by repeating the analyzes in the presence of extrinsic metabolic activation in order to check if it was possible to totally exclude the mutagenic capacity for α-PVP and α-PHP. The results demonstrated instead the mutagenicity of their metabolites. We then evaluated reactive oxygen species (ROS) induction as a possible mechanism at the basis of the highlighted effects but the results did not show a statistically significant increase in ROS levels for any of the tested substances. Anyway, our outcomes emphasize the importance of mutagenicity evaluation for a complete assessment of the risk associated with synthetic cathinones exposure.

Indexed as

AlkaloidsApoptosisCell DeathCell LineCell SurvivalHumansMethamphetamineMicronucleus, GermlineMutagensPentanonesPyrrolidinesReactive Oxygen Species1-phenyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-1-pentanoneAlkaloidsalpha-pyrrolidinohexanophenonecathinoneMethamphetaminemexedroneMutagensPentanonesPyrrolidinesReactive Oxygen Speciesflow cytometrymexedronemutagenicitynovel psychoactive substancesROSS9 mixsynthetic cathinonesα-PHPα-PVP

Identifiers

PMID34204826
PMCPMC8231654
OpenAlexW3172458920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.