ReviewToxics2021
Estimation of the Inhaled Dose of Pollutants in Different Micro-Environments: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Review in Toxics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of controlled, acute exposure to air pollutants on heart rate variability in humans: a meta-regression and methodological recommendations.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of the inhaled dose of air pollution on health: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Pooled it
- Modelled Physical Activity Benefits and PMToxics · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- A Critical Comparison of Exposure Estimators for Airborne Particulate Matter in Urban Cyclists.Toxics · 2026Article
- Article
- Effect modification of long-term air pollution exposure on the association of physical activity with COPD hospitalization: a prospective cohort study of 0.5 million Chinese adults.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Article
- A New Wearable System for Personal Air Pollution Exposure Estimation: Pilot Observational Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Observational
- Adjustment Criteria for Air-Quality Standards by Altitude: A Scoping Review with Regulatory Overview.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Hotels as quarantine facilities with airborne virus controls.Building and environment · 2025Article
- Pro-inflammatory effects of inhaled Great Salt Lake dust particles.Particle and fibre toxicology · 2025Article
- AirPredict: an eHealth platform for asthma management leveraging wearable sensors, digital diaries, and air quality monitoring to optimize patient outcomes.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Pro-Inflammatory Effects of Inhaled Great Salt Lake Dust Particles.Research square · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Impact of Hydrophobic Silicon Dioxide in the Interfacial Properties of Lung Surfactant Films.Environmental science & technology · 2022Article
- Did air pollution continue to affect bike share usage in Seoul during the COVID-19 pandemic?Journal of transport & health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, the need to assess personal exposure in different micro-environments has been highlighted. Further, estimating the inhaled dose of pollutants is considerably one of the most interesting parameters to be explored to complete the fundamental information obtained through exposure assessment, especially if associated with a dose-response approach. To analyze the main results obtained from the studies related to the estimation of the inhaled dose of pollutants in different micro-environments (environments in which an individual spends a part of his day), and to identify the influence of different parameters on it, a systematic review of the literature was performed. The principal outcomes from the considered studies outlined that (i) exposure concentration and residence time are among the most important parameters to be evaluated in the estimation of the inhaled dose, especially in transport environments. Further, (ii) the pulmonary ventilation rate can be of particular interest during active commuting because of its increase, which increases the inhalation of pollutants. From a methodological point of view, the advent of increasingly miniaturized, portable and low-cost technologies could favor these kinds of studies, both for the measurement of atmospheric pollutants and the real-time evaluation of physiological parameters used for estimation of the inhaled dose. The main results of this review also show some knowledge gaps. In particular, numerous studies have been conducted for the evaluation (in terms of personal exposure and estimation of the inhaled dose) of different PM fractions: other airborne pollutants, although harmful to human health, are less represented in studies of this type: for this reason, future studies should be conducted, also considering other air pollutants, not neglecting the assessment of exposure to PM. Moreover, many studies have been conducted indoors, where the population spends most of their daily time. However, it has been highlighted how particular environments, even if characterized by a shorter residence time, can contribute significantly to the dose of inhaled pollutants. These environments are, therefore, of particular importance and should be better evaluated in future studies, as well as occupational environments, where the work results in a high pulmonary ventilation rate. The attention of future studies should also be focused on these categories of subjects and occupational studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.