Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204794›Full record

ReviewToxics2021

Estimation of the Inhaled Dose of Pollutants in Different Micro-Environments: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Francesca Borghi, Andrea Spinazzè, Simone Mandaglio, Giacomo Fanti, Davide Campagnolo, Sabrina Rovelli, Marta Keller, Andrea Cattaneo, Domenico Maria Cavallo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of the inhaled dose of air pollution on health: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Adjustment Criteria for Air-Quality Standards by Altitude: A Scoping Review with Regulatory Overview.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Francesca BorghiDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3452-2803
Andrea SpinazzèDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0371-3164
Simone MandaglioDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.
Giacomo FantiDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3728-839X
Davide CampagnoloDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2836-6106
Sabrina RovelliDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6403-5101
Marta KellerDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3608-7964
Andrea CattaneoDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2962-7259
Domenico Maria CavalloDepartment of Science and High Technology, University of Insubria, 22100 Como, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the need to assess personal exposure in different micro-environments has been highlighted. Further, estimating the inhaled dose of pollutants is considerably one of the most interesting parameters to be explored to complete the fundamental information obtained through exposure assessment, especially if associated with a dose-response approach. To analyze the main results obtained from the studies related to the estimation of the inhaled dose of pollutants in different micro-environments (environments in which an individual spends a part of his day), and to identify the influence of different parameters on it, a systematic review of the literature was performed. The principal outcomes from the considered studies outlined that (i) exposure concentration and residence time are among the most important parameters to be evaluated in the estimation of the inhaled dose, especially in transport environments. Further, (ii) the pulmonary ventilation rate can be of particular interest during active commuting because of its increase, which increases the inhalation of pollutants. From a methodological point of view, the advent of increasingly miniaturized, portable and low-cost technologies could favor these kinds of studies, both for the measurement of atmospheric pollutants and the real-time evaluation of physiological parameters used for estimation of the inhaled dose. The main results of this review also show some knowledge gaps. In particular, numerous studies have been conducted for the evaluation (in terms of personal exposure and estimation of the inhaled dose) of different PM fractions: other airborne pollutants, although harmful to human health, are less represented in studies of this type: for this reason, future studies should be conducted, also considering other air pollutants, not neglecting the assessment of exposure to PM. Moreover, many studies have been conducted indoors, where the population spends most of their daily time. However, it has been highlighted how particular environments, even if characterized by a shorter residence time, can contribute significantly to the dose of inhaled pollutants. These environments are, therefore, of particular importance and should be better evaluated in future studies, as well as occupational environments, where the work results in a high pulmonary ventilation rate. The attention of future studies should also be focused on these categories of subjects and occupational studies.

Indexed as

activity patternsindoor air pollutionoutdoor air pollutionpersonal exposurepulmonary ventilation rateresidence time

Identifiers

PMID34204794
PMCPMC8231583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.