Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204761›Full record

ReviewInsects2021

Climate Mismatch between Introduced Biological Control Agents and Their Invasive Host Plants: Improving Biological Control of Tropical Weeds in Temperate Regions.

Nathan E Harms, Ian A Knight, Paul D Pratt, Angelica M Reddy, Abhishek Mukherjee, Ping Gong, Julie Coetzee, S Raghu, Rodrigo Diaz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Nathan E HarmsAquatic Ecology and Invasive Species Branch, Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS 39180, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1614-3255
Ian A KnightAquatic Ecology and Invasive Species Branch, Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS 39180, USA.
Paul D PrattInvasive Species and Pollinator Health Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA 94710, USA.
Angelica M ReddyInvasive Species and Pollinator Health Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Albany, CA 94710, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8170-0188
Abhishek MukherjeeIndian Statistical Institute, Giridih, Jharkhand 815301, India.
Ping GongEnvironmental Processes Branch, Environmental Laboratory, US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS 39180, USA.
Julie CoetzeeCentre for Biological Control, Botany Department, Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-0364-3349
S RaghuCSIRO Health & Biosecurity, Brisbane 4001, Australia.
Rodrigo DiazDepartment of Entomology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center · USAgricultural Research Service · USCSIRO Health and Biosecurity · AUIndian Statistical Institute · INLouisiana State University · USRhodes University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many weed biological control programs suffer from large-scale spatial variation in success due to restricted distributions or abundances of agents in temperate climates. For some of the world's worst aquatic weeds, agents are established but overwintering conditions limit their survival in higher latitudes or elevations. The resulting need is for new or improved site- or region-specific biological control tools. Here, we review this challenge with a focus on low-temperature limitations of agents and propose a roadmap for improving success. Investigations across spatial scales, from global (e.g., foreign exploration), to local (selective breeding), to individual organisms (molecular modification), are discussed. A combination of traditional (foreign) and non-traditional (introduced range) exploration may lead to the discovery and development of better-adapted agent genotypes. A multivariate approach using ecologically relevant metrics to quantify and compare cold tolerance among agent populations is likely required. These data can be used to inform environmental niche modeling combined with mechanistic modeling of species' fundamental climate niches and life histories to predict where, when, and at what abundance agents will occur. Finally, synthetic and systems biology approaches in conjunction with advanced modern genomics, gene silencing and gene editing technologies may be used to identify and alter the expression of genes enhancing cold tolerance, but this technology in the context of weed biological control has not been fully explored.

Indexed as

biogeographyclimate mismatchesenhanced traitsinvasive plantsthermal physiology

Identifiers

PMID34204761
PMCPMC8231509
OpenAlexW3172822414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.