Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204531›Full record

Observational studyCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2021

The Feasibility and Effects of a Telehealth-Delivered Home-Based Prehabilitation Program for Cancer Patients during the Pandemic.

Fiona Wu, Oloruntobi Rotimi, Roberto Laza-Cagigas, Tarannum Rampal

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05547594 (Impact of a Multimodal Prehabilitation Programme on Markers of Health, Quality of Life and the Short and Long Post-surgery Recovery Period in Cancer Patients With Type 2 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05547594 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Multimodal Prehabilitation Programme on Markers of Health, Quality of Life and the Short and Long Post-surgery Recovery Period in Cancer Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of GreenwichRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsCancer, Type 2 DiabetesArmsMultimodal surgical prehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multimodal Prehabilitation for Gynecologic Cancer Surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona WuSurgery and Anesthetics Department, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Trust, Margate CT9 4AN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8295-788X
Oloruntobi RotimiFoundation Program, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton BN2 5BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1385-1993
Roberto Laza-CagigasKent and Medway Prehab, Chatham ME4 4TR, UK.
Tarannum RampalKent and Medway Prehab, Chatham ME4 4TR, UK.
Medway School of Pharmacy · GBEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Kent and Medway Prehab NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients awaiting cancer treatment were classified as "vulnerable" and advised to shield to protect themselves from exposure to coronavirus during the pandemic. These measures can negatively impact patients. We sought to establish the feasibility and effects of a telehealth-delivered home-based prehabilitation program during the pandemic. Eligible patients were referred from multiple centers to a regional prehabilitation unit providing home-based prehabilitation. The enrolled patients received telehealth-delivered prehabilitation prior to surgery and/or during non-surgical cancer treatment, which included personalized training exercises, dietary advice, medical optimization therapies, and psychological support. The primary outcome was to investigate the feasibility of our program. The secondary outcome was to investigate the relationship between our program and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The patients completed two questionnaires (the EQ-5D-3L and the FACIT-Fatigue Scale) pre- and post-intervention. A total of 182 patients were referred during the study period. Among the 139 (76%) patients that were enrolled, 100 patients completed the program, 24 patients have still to complete, and 15 have discontinued. A total of 66 patients were able to return completed questionnaires. These patients were recruited from colorectal, urology, breast, and cardiothoracic centers. The patients significantly improved their self-perceived health (

Indexed as

AgedCOVID-19EnglandExerciseFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrecision MedicinePreoperative CarePreoperative ExerciseProspective StudiesQuality of Lifecancer caredeconditioningexercise oncologypandemicprehabilitationshieldingsurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID34204531
PMCPMC8293185
OpenAlexW3169283793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.