Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204504›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Impact of Shift Work and Long Working Hours on Worker Cognitive Functions: Current Evidence and Future Research Needs.

Veruscka Leso, Luca Fontana, Angela Caturano, Ilaria Vetrani, Mauro Fedele, Ivo Iavicoli

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07455981 (Assessment of the Interaction Between Atypical Working Hours and/or Periods of Inactivity on Risky Gambling Practices Among Adults Working Under These Conditions.), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07455981 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of the Interaction Between Atypical Working Hours and/or Periods of Inactivity on Risky Gambling Practices Among Adults Working Under These Conditions.

TypeobservationalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2026 to 2026Enrolled1,600ConditionsProblem Gambling, Addiction GamblingArmsCompletion of an online survey lasting approximately 25 minutes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Organizational Risk Factors for Aircrew Health: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Veruscka LesoDepartment of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3039-2856
Luca FontanaDepartment of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4621-7374
Angela CaturanoDepartment of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Ilaria VetraniDepartment of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8374-4774
Mauro FedeleDepartment of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Ivo IavicoliDepartment of Public Health, Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0444-3792
University of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Particular working conditions and/or organization of working time may cause important sleep disturbances that have been proposed to be predictive of cognitive decline. In this regard, circadian rhythm misalignment induced by exposure to night work or long working hours would be responsible for cognitive impairment. Nevertheless, evidence supporting this correlation is limited and several issues still need to be elucidated. In this regard, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the association between shift/night work and cognitive impairment and address its main determinants. Information provided by the reviewed studies suggested that night work might have serious immediate negative effects especially on cognitive domains related to attention, memory and response inhibition. Furthermore, cognitive performance would progressively worsen over consecutive night shifts or following exposure to very long work shifts. Otherwise, conflicting results emerged regarding the possible etiological role that night work chronic exposure would have on cognitive impairment. Therefore, circadian rhythm desynchronization, lack of sleep and fatigue resulting from night work may negatively impact worker's cognitive efficiency. However, in light of the considerable methodological variability of the reviewed studies, we proposed to develop a standardized research and evaluation strategy in order to obtain a better and comprehensive understanding of this topic.

Indexed as

Shift Work ScheduleSleep Disorders, Circadian RhythmCircadian RhythmCognitionHumansSleepWork Schedule Tolerancecircadian rhythmcognitive impairmentfatiguelong working hoursnight workshift worksleep disturbances

Identifiers

PMID34204504
PMCPMC8296479
OpenAlexW3166353495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.