Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204415›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2021

Effects of Percutaneous Electrolysis on Endogenous Pain Modulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Protocol.

Sergio Varela-Rodríguez, Juan Luis Sánchez-González, José Luis Sánchez-Sánchez, Miguel Delicado-Miralles, Enrique Velasco, César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas, Laura Calderón-Díez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sergio Varela-RodríguezDepartment of Nursery and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursery and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6269-3883
Juan Luis Sánchez-GonzálezDepartment of Nursery and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursery and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4791-6513
José Luis Sánchez-SánchezDepartment of Nursery and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursery and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9782-4764
Miguel Delicado-MirallesInstituto de Neurociencias de Alicante (CSIC-UMH), 03550 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5181-6742
Enrique VelascoInstituto de Neurociencias de Alicante (CSIC-UMH), 03550 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7299-0750
César Fernández-de-Las-PeñasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), 28922 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3772-9690
Laura Calderón-DíezDepartment of Nursery and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursery and Physiotherapy, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Universidad de Salamanca · ESInstituto de Neurociencias · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Percutaneous electrolysis consists of the application of a galvanic electrical current throughout an acupuncture needle. It has been previously hypothesized that needling procedures' neurophysiological effects may be related to endogenous pain modulation (EPM). This protocol study describes the design of a double-blind (participant, assessor) randomized controlled trial with the aim to investigate whether percutaneous electrolysis is able to enhance EPM and whether the effect is different between two applications depending on the dosage of the galvanic electrical current. Seventy-two asymptomatic subjects not reporting the presence of pain symptoms the previous 6 months before the study, aged 18-40 years, are randomized into one of four groups: a control group who does not receive any intervention, a needling group who receives a needling intervention without electrical current, a low-intensity percutaneous electrolysis group (0.3 mA × 90 s), and a high-intensity percutaneous electrolysis group (three bouts of 3 mA × 3 s). Needling intervention consists of ultrasound-guided insertion of the needle on the common extensor tendon of the lateral epicondyle. The primary outcome is conditioned pain modulation (CPM), and secondary outcomes include widespread pressure pain sensitivity (pressure pain thresholds (PPT) over the lateral epicondyle, the cervical spine, and the tibialis anterior muscle) and temporal summation (TS). We expected that percutaneous electrolysis would have a greater influence on CPM than an isolated needling procedure and no intervention. In addition, we also postulated that there might be differences in outcome measures depending on the intensity of the electrical current during the percutaneous electrolysis application. This study makes a new contribution to the field of neurophysiological effects of percutaneous electrolysis and needling interventions.

Indexed as

conditioned pain modulationelectrical stimulationpain pressure thresholdpercutaneous electrolysisprotocolultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID34204415
PMCPMC8235332
OpenAlexW3170200721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.