Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204403›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Psychological Effects of Home Confinement and Social Distancing Derived from COVID-19 in the General Population-A Systematic Review.

Paula Rodríguez-Fernández, Josefa González-Santos, Mirian Santamaría-Peláez, Raúl Soto-Cámara, Esteban Sánchez-González, Jerónimo J González-Bernal

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Mental Health Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mexican Population: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Social Media, Anxiety and COVID-19 Lockdown Measurement Compliance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paula Rodríguez-FernándezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0925-6187
Josefa González-SantosDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.
Mirian Santamaría-PeláezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4255-7355
Raúl Soto-CámaraDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9072-0364
Esteban Sánchez-GonzálezDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Jan Kochanowski, 25-369 Kielce, Poland.
Jerónimo J González-BernalDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-9060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Home confinement and social distancing are two of the main public health measures to curb the spread of SARS-Cov-2, which can have harmful consequences on people's mental health. This systematic review aims to identify the best available scientific evidence on the impact that home confinement and social distancing, derived from the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, have had on the mental health of the general population in terms of depression, stress and anxiety. (2) Methods: A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and ScienceDirect between 2 January 2021 and 7 January 2021, in accordance with the recommendations of the PRISMA Declaration. The selection of studies and the evaluation of their methodological quality were performed in pairs, independently and blindly, based on predetermined eligibility criteria. (3) Results: The 26 investigations reviewed were developed in different regions and countries. Factors that are associated with poor mental health were female gender, young ages, having no income and suffering from a previous psychiatric illness. Inadequate management of the pandemic by authorities and a lack or excess of information also contributed to worse mental health. (4) Conclusions: There are groups of people more likely to suffer higher levels of anxiety, depression and stress during the restrictive measures derived from COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19AnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansPandemicsPhysical DistancingSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicaladultsanxietyCOVID-19depressiongeneral populationhome confinementmental healthpandemicsocial distancingstress

Identifiers

PMID34204403
PMCPMC8296481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.