Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204353›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Areas of Interest and Attitudes towards the Pharmacological Treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Thematic and Quantitative Analysis Using Twitter.

Miguel Angel Alvarez-Mon, Laura de Anta, Maria Llavero-Valero, Guillermo Lahera, Miguel A Ortega, Cesar Soutullo, Javier Quintero, Angel Asunsolo Del Barco, Melchor Alvarez-Mon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patterns of prescription stimulant initiation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based time-series analysis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Assessment of beliefs and attitudes about electroconvulsive therapy posted on Twitter: An observational study.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Miguel Angel Alvarez-MonService of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, 28031 Madrid, Spain.
Laura de AntaService of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, 28031 Madrid, Spain.
Maria Llavero-ValeroDepartment of Endocrinology and Clinical Nutrition, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, 28031 Madrid, Spain.
Guillermo LaheraDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Alcala, 28805 Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6152-3564
Miguel A OrtegaDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Alcala, 28805 Alcala de Henares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2588-1708
Cesar SoutulloLouis A Faillace Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX 77054, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4348-0772
Javier QuinteroService of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, 28031 Madrid, Spain.
Angel Asunsolo Del BarcoInstitute Ramon y Cajal for Health Research (IRYCIS), 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-4685
Melchor Alvarez-MonDepartment of Medicine and Medical Specialities, University of Alcala, 28805 Alcala de Henares, Spain.

Funding

METHADONE TREATMENT: A STUDY OF A COUNTY POLICY CHANGER01DA003804 · NIDA · SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS CORPORATION · PI ROSENBAUM, MARSHA · 1985 to 1989
–
Comunidad de Madrid B2017/BMD-3804Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI18/01726
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We focused on tweets containing hashtags related to ADHD pharmacotherapy between 20 September and 31 October 2019. Tweets were classified as to whether they described medical issues or not. Tweets with medical content were classified according to the topic they referred to: side effects, efficacy, or adherence. Furthermore, we classified any links included within a tweet as either scientific or non-scientific. We created a dataset of 6568 tweets: 4949 (75.4%) related to stimulants, 605 (9.2%) to non-stimulants and 1014 (15.4%) to alpha-2 agonists. Next, we manually analyzed 1810 tweets. In the end, 481 (48%) of the tweets in the stimulant group, 218 (71.9%) in the non-stimulant group and 162 (31.9%) in the alpha agonist group were considered classifiable. Stimulants accumulated the majority of tweets. Notably, the content that generated the highest frequency of tweets was that related to treatment efficacy, with alpha-2 agonist-related tweets accumulating the highest proportion of positive consideration. We found the highest percentages of tweets with scientific links in those posts related to alpha-2 agonists. Stimulant-related tweets obtained the highest proportion of likes and were the most disseminated within the Twitter community. Understanding the public view of these medications is necessary to design promotional strategies aimed at the appropriate population.

Indexed as

ADHDalpha-2-adrenergic agonistsnon-stimulantspharmacotherapysocial mediastimulantsTwitter

Identifiers

PMID34204353
PMCPMC8235344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.