ArticleBrain sciences2021
External Validation and Calibration of the DecaPreT Prediction Model for Decannulation in Patients with Acquired Brain Injury.
Article in Brain sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.Alpha psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Predictive Factors of Successful Decannulation in Tracheostomy Patients: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- External Validation and Update of the Risk Prediction Model for Denosumab-Induced Hypocalcemia Developed From a Hospital-Based Administrative Database.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Factors Associated With Time to Decannulation in Patients With Tracheostomy Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Respiratory care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose a new set of clinical variables for a more accurate early prediction of safe decannulation in patients with severe acquired brain injury (ABI), during a post-acute rehabilitation course. Starting from the already validated DecaPreT scale, we tested the accuracy of new logistic regression models where the coefficients of the original predictors were reestimated. Patients with tracheostomy were retrospectively selected from the database of the neurorehabilitation unit at the S. Anna Institute of Crotone, Italy. New potential predictors of decannulation were screened from variables collected on admission during clinical examination, including (a) age at injury, (b) coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-r) scores, and c) length of ICU period. Of 273 patients with ABI (mean age 53.01 years; 34% female; median DecaPreT = 0.61), 61.5% were safely decannulated before discharge. In the validation phase, the linear logistic prediction model, created with the new multivariable predictors, obtained an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.901. Our model improves the reliability of simple clinical variables detected at the admission of the post-acute phase in predicting decannulation of ABI patients, thus helping clinicians to plan better rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.