ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2021
ASSURED Point-of-Need Food Safety Screening: A Critical Assessment of Portable Food Analyzers.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review of On-Site Rapid Detection Methods for Antibiotic Residues in Aquatic Products (2021-2025).Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances in Optical Sensing Technologies for On-Site Detection of Harmful Residues in Food: Principles and Recent Applications.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics for Seafood Allergen Detection and Quantification: Current Trends and Technological Frontiers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Superparamagnetic Bead-Based Microfluidic Fluoroimmunoassay Platform for Rapid Ochratoxin A Detection in Flour.ACS sensors · 2025Article
- Smartcard: an integrated approach for contaminant monitoring, from field to laboratory.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Chemometrics-aided surface-enhanced Raman spectrometric detection and quantification of GH and TE hormones in blood.PloS one · 2025Article
- Ultrasensitive Lateral Flow Immunoassay of Fluoroquinolone Antibiotic Gatifloxacin Using Au@Ag Nanoparticles as a Signal-Enhancing Label.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Impact of Metabolites from Foodborne Pathogens on Cancer.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Antiviral drugs in animal-derived matrices: A review.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Ensuring food safety: Microfluidic-based approaches for the detection of food contaminants.Analytical science advances · 2024Review
- Integrating Wireless Remote Sensing and Sensors for Monitoring Pesticide Pollution in Surface and Groundwater.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Microfluidic paper analytic device (μPAD) technology for food safety applications.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
- Emerging Roles of Microrobots for Enhancing the Sensitivity of Biosensors.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- An analysis of the nutritional effects ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2023Review
- Metrological traceability in process analytical technologies and point-of-need technologies for food safety and quality control: not a straightforward issue.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2023Review
- Portable mass spectrometry system: instrumentation, applications, and path to 'omics analysis.Proteomics · 2022Review
- Asymmetric Mach-Zehnder Interferometric Biosensing for Quantitative and Sensitive Multiplex Detection of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Human Plasma.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Review
- Novel Analytical Methods in Food Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Immuno-Enriched Microspheres - Magnetic Blade Spray-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Domoic Acid in Mussels.Analytical chemistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard methods for chemical food safety testing in official laboratories rely largely on liquid or gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Although these methods are considered the gold standard for quantitative confirmatory analysis, they require sampling, transferring the samples to a central laboratory to be tested by highly trained personnel, and the use of expensive equipment. Therefore, there is an increasing demand for portable and handheld devices to provide rapid, efficient, and on-site screening of food contaminants. Recent technological advancements in the field include smartphone-based, microfluidic chip-based, and paper-based devices integrated with electrochemical and optical biosensing platforms. Furthermore, the potential application of portable mass spectrometers in food testing might bring the confirmatory analysis from the laboratory to the field in the future. Although such systems open new promising possibilities for portable food testing, few of these devices are commercially available. To understand why barriers remain, portable food analyzers reported in the literature over the last ten years were reviewed. To this end, the analytical performance of these devices and the extent they match the World Health Organization benchmark for diagnostic tests, i.e., the Affordable, Sensitive, Specific, User-friendly, Rapid and Robust, Equipment-free, and Deliverable to end-users (ASSURED) criteria, was evaluated critically. A five-star scoring system was used to assess their potential to be implemented as food safety testing systems. The main findings highlight the need for concentrated efforts towards combining the best features of different technologies, to bridge technological gaps and meet commercialization requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.