Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204180›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Evaluation of Euthanasia Methods on Behavioral and Physiological Responses of Newly Hatched Male Layer Chicks.

Xi Wang, Dan Zhao, Allison C Milby, Gregory S Archer, E David Peebles, Shailesh Gurung, Morgan B Farnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The use of high expansion foam for stunning and killing pigs and poultry.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xi WangDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Dan ZhaoDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0292-2012
Allison C MilbyDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Gregory S ArcherDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
E David PeeblesDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Shailesh GurungDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Morgan B FarnellDepartment of Poultry Science, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7730-7383

Funding

Training and Mentoring Core P20GM103476 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI MICHAEL R GARRETT · 2012 to 2026
$60.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103476U.S. Poultry and Egg Association Unknown
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Newly hatched male layer chicks are considered as "by-products" in the egg industry and must be humanely euthanized at the hatchery. Instantaneous mechanical destruction (maceration) is the predominant euthanasia method applied in poultry hatcheries and is approved by the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). However, maceration is not perceived by the public to be a humane means of euthanasia. The effects of alternative euthanasia methods, including carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

carbon dioxidechickeneuthanasialow atmospheric pressurenitrogenwelfare

Identifiers

PMID34204180
PMCPMC8235231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.