ReviewBiology2021
Review in Biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological parts in yeast synthetic biology: from regulatory elements to predictive design platforms.FEMS yeast research · 2026Review
- Systematic Characterization and Analysis of the Freeze-Thaw Tolerance Gene Set in the Budding Yeast,International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Advancing cellulose utilization and engineering consolidated bioprocessing yeasts: current state and perspectives.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Expanding the Yeast MoClo Toolkit: gene expression control parts forSynthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Engineering strategies for enhanced heterologous protein production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Microbial cell factories · 2024Review
- Systematic sequence engineering enhances the induction strength of the glucose-regulated GTH1 promoter of Komagataella phaffii.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- ImprovingHeliyon · 2023Article
- Natural promoters and promoter engineering strategies for metabolic regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2023Review
- Article
- Review
- Applicability of the heterologous yeast promoters for recombinant protein production in Pichia pastoris.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Mining novelFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Intelligent host engineering for metabolic flux optimisation in biotechnology.The Biochemical journal · 2021Review
- Enhancing Yeast Surface Display: UPR, ERAD, and ER Dynamics in Recombinant Protein Production.Food technology and biotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic gene circuits are made of DNA sequences, referred to as transcription units, that communicate by exchanging proteins or RNA molecules. Proteins are, mostly, transcription factors that bind promoter sequences to modulate the expression of other molecules. Promoters are, therefore, key components in genetic circuits. In this review, we focus our attention on the construction of artificial promoters for the yeast
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.