Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34204008›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Culture Medium and Sex Drive Epigenetic Reprogramming in Preimplantation Bovine Embryos.

Sebastian Canovas, Elena Ivanova, Meriem Hamdi, Fernando Perez-Sanz, Dimitrios Rizos, Gavin Kelsey, Pilar Coy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian CanovasPhysiology of Reproduction Group, Physiology Department, Mare Nostrum Campus, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.
Elena IvanovaEpigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.
Meriem HamdiAnimal Reproduction Department, National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology, INIA, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Perez-SanzBiomedical Research Institute of Murcia, IMIB-Arrixaca-UMU, 30120 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8143-7794
Dimitrios RizosAnimal Reproduction Department, National Institute for Agriculture and Food Research and Technology, INIA, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6813-3940
Gavin KelseyEpigenetics Programme, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB22 3AT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9762-5634
Pilar CoyPhysiology of Reproduction Group, Physiology Department, Mare Nostrum Campus, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3943-1890
Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ESBabraham Institute · GBInstitute of Agrifood Research and Technology · ES

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/B/000C0423Medical Research Council MR/K011332/1Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación AGL2015-66341-RMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación AGL-2015-70140-RMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2019-111641RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assisted reproductive technologies impact transcriptome and epigenome of embryos and can result in long-term phenotypic consequences. Whole-genome DNA methylation profiles from individual bovine blastocysts in vivo- and in vitro-derived (using three sources of protein: reproductive fluids, blood serum and bovine serum albumin) were generated. The impact of in vitro culture on DNA methylation was analyzed, and sex-specific methylation differences at blastocyst stage were uncovered. In vivo embryos showed the highest levels of methylation (29.5%), close to those produced in vitro with serum, whilst embryos produced in vitro with reproductive fluids or albumin showed less global methylation (25-25.4%). During repetitive element analysis, the serum group was the most affected. DNA methylation differences between in vivo and in vitro groups were more frequent in the first intron than in CpGi in promoters. Moreover, hierarchical cluster analysis showed that sex produced a stronger bias in the results than embryo origin. For each group, distance between male and female embryos varied, with in vivo blastocyst showing a lesser distance. Between the sexually dimorphic methylated tiles, which were biased to X-chromosome, critical factors for reproduction, developmental process, cell proliferation and DNA methylation machinery were included. These results support the idea that blastocysts show sexually-dimorphic DNA methylation patterns, and the known picture about the blastocyst methylome should be reconsidered.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsBlastocystCattleCellular ReprogrammingChromosomes, MammalianCpG IslandsCulture MediaDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleFertilization in VitroGene OntologyLogistic ModelsMaleMolecular Sequence AnnotationCulture MediabovineDNA methylationembryoepigeneticpreimplantationsexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID34204008
PMCPMC8232708
OpenAlexW3166923524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.