Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203900›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

Breeding and Maintenance of Immunodeficient Mouse Lines under SPF Conditions-A Call for Individualized Severity Analyses and Approval Procedures.

Thomas Kammertoens, Sarah Jeuthe, Heike Baranzke, Antonina Klippert, Christa Thöne-Reineke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas KammertoensInstitute of Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Campus Berlin Buch, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Sarah JeutheMax Delbrück Centrum Berlin, Campus Berlin Buch, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Heike BaranzkeFaculty of Humanities and Cultural Studies-Catholic Theology, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Gaußstraße 20, 42119 Wuppertal, Germany.
Antonina KlippertNuvisan Innovation Campus Berlin GmbH, Muellerstrasse 178, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Christa Thöne-ReinekeAnimal Behavior and Laboratory Animal Science, Institute for Animal Welfare, Freie Universität Berlin, Königsweg 67, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0782-2755
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DEMax Delbrück Center · DENuvisan (Germany) · DEUniversity of Wuppertal · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the EU, the breeding of genetically modified laboratory animals is, by definition, an animal experiment if the offspring may experience pain, suffering, or harm. In order to determine the actual burden of genetically modified mice, established methods are available. However, the breeding of immunodeficient mice is considered an experiment requiring a permit, even if no pain, suffering or harm is observed under scientifically required defined hygienic housing conditions, as determined by established methods of severity assessment. This seems contradictory and leads to uncertainty among scientists. With this commentary, we would like to shed light on this topic from different perspectives and propose a solution in terms of individualized severity assessment and approval procedures.

Indexed as

3Ranimal experimentimmunodeficiencyseverity assessment

Identifiers

PMID34203900
PMCPMC8232569
OpenAlexW3171819453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.