Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203896›Full record

ArticleCancers2021

Impact of Preprocessing and Harmonization Methods on the Removal of Scanner Effects in Brain MRI Radiomic Features.

Yingping Li, Samy Ammari, Corinne Balleyguier, Nathalie Lassau, Emilie Chouzenoux

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Disentangled latent energy-based style translation: An image-level structural MRI harmonization framework.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yingping LiLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale Paris Saclay, UMR1281 Inserm, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (CEA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4145-8395
Samy AmmariLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale Paris Saclay, UMR1281 Inserm, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (CEA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1506-0714
Corinne BalleyguierLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale Paris Saclay, UMR1281 Inserm, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (CEA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-8731
Nathalie LassauLaboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale Multimodale Paris Saclay, UMR1281 Inserm, Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (CEA), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8068-6513
Emilie ChouzenouxCentre de Vision Numérique, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (INRIA), Université Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3631-6093
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique · FR

Funding

China Scholarship Council (CSC) 201801810027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In brain MRI radiomics studies, the non-biological variations introduced by different image acquisition settings, namely scanner effects, affect the reliability and reproducibility of the radiomics results. This paper assesses how the preprocessing methods (including N4 bias field correction and image resampling) and the harmonization methods (either the six intensity normalization methods working on brain MRI images or the ComBat method working on radiomic features) help to remove the scanner effects and improve the radiomic feature reproducibility in brain MRI radiomics. The analyses were based on in vitro datasets (homogeneous and heterogeneous phantom data) and in vivo datasets (brain MRI images collected from healthy volunteers and clinical patients with brain tumors). The results show that the ComBat method is essential and vital to remove scanner effects in brain MRI radiomic studies. Moreover, the intensity normalization methods, while not able to remove scanner effects at the radiomic feature level, still yield more comparable MRI images and improve the robustness of the harmonized features to the choice among ComBat implementations.

Indexed as

brain MRI radiomicsComBatharmonization methodsintensity normalizationreproducibilityscanner effects

Identifiers

PMID34203896
PMCPMC8232807
OpenAlexW3168794704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.