Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203823›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Molecular Physiology of Anaerobic Phototrophic Purple and Green Sulfur Bacteria.

Ivan Kushkevych, Jiří Procházka, Márió Gajdács, Simon K-M R Rittmann, Monika Vítězová

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Trade-offs between light absorption and energy transfer in a marine light-harvesting complex 2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ivan KushkevychDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8450-7137
Jiří ProcházkaDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.
Márió GajdácsDepartment of Pharmacodynamics and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Eötvös utca 6, 6720 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1270-0365
Simon K-M R RittmannArchaea Physiology & Biotechnology Group, Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Universität Wien, 1090 Wien, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9746-3284
Monika VítězováDepartment of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-0999-7957

Funding

Emberi Eroforrások Minisztériuma ÚNKP-20-5-SZTE-330 New National Excellence Program of the Ministry for Innovation and Technology from the source of the National Research, Development and Innovation FundMagyar Tudományos Akadémia János Bolyai Research Scholarship (BO/00144/20/5) of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesMasarykova Univerzita Grant Agency of Masaryk University (MUNI/A/1425/2020)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are two main types of bacterial photosynthesis: oxygenic (cyanobacteria) and anoxygenic (sulfur and non-sulfur phototrophs). Molecular mechanisms of photosynthesis in the phototrophic microorganisms can differ and depend on their location and pigments in the cells. This paper describes bacteria capable of molecular oxidizing hydrogen sulfide, specifically the families

Indexed as

AnaerobiosisChlorobiChromatiaceaePhototrophic ProcessesPhylogenySulfurSulfuranaerobesanoxygenic bacteriadetoxificationhydrogen sulfidemolecular mechanisms of photosynthesiswater environment

Identifiers

PMID34203823
PMCPMC8232776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.