Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203715›Full record

ReviewBiosensors2021

Trends in the Design of Intensity-Based Optical Fiber Biosensors (2010-2020).

Nerea De Acha, Abián B Socorro-Leránoz, César Elosúa, Ignacio R Matías

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biosensors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nerea De AchaDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Communication Engineering, Public University of Navarra, E-31006 Pamplona, Spain.
Abián B Socorro-LeránozDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Communication Engineering, Public University of Navarra, E-31006 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4843-9023
César ElosúaDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Communication Engineering, Public University of Navarra, E-31006 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5219-989X
Ignacio R MatíasDepartment of Electrical, Electronic and Communication Engineering, Public University of Navarra, E-31006 Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2229-6178

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2019-106231RB-I00 - ESPADAGobierno de Navarra 0011-1365-2020-000061 - BREATHA- 640 LYSER (FEDER)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There exists an increasing interest in monitoring low concentrations of biochemical species, as they allow the early-stage detection of illnesses or the monitoring of the environment quality. Thus, both companies and research groups are focused on the development of accurate, fast and highly sensitive biosensors. Optical fiber sensors have been widely employed for these purposes because they provide several advantages for their use in point-of-care and real-time applications. In particular, this review is focused on optical fiber biosensors based on luminescence and absorption. Apart from the key parameters that determine the performance of a sensor (limit of detection, sensibility, cross-sensibility, etc.), other features are analyzed, such as the optical fiber dimensions, the sensing set ups and the fiber functionalization. The aim of this review is to have a comprehensive insight of the different aspects that must be taken into account when working with this kind of sensors.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesOptical FibersPoint-of-Care SystemsSurface Plasmon Resonanceabsorptionbiosensorfluorescencelocalized surface plasmon resonanceluminescenceoptical fiber sensors

Identifiers

PMID34203715
PMCPMC8232210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.