Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203714›Full record

ReviewPharmaceutics2021

Recent Advances in Polymer-Based Vaginal Drug Delivery Systems.

Tomasz Osmałek, Anna Froelich, Barbara Jadach, Adam Tatarek, Piotr Gadziński, Aleksandra Falana, Kinga Gralińska, Michał Ekert, Vinam Puri, Joanna Wrotyńska-Barczyńska and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmaceutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Therapeutic peptides and proteins: Status and developments in drug delivery.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomasz OsmałekChair and Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-780 Poznań, Poland.
Anna FroelichChair and Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-780 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1491-1329
Barbara JadachChair and Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-780 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5222-4557
Adam TatarekChair and Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-780 Poznań, Poland.
Piotr GadzińskiChair and Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-780 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7577-7410
Aleksandra FalanaChair and Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-780 Poznań, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2713-6912
Kinga GralińskaChair and Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-780 Poznań, Poland.
Michał EkertChair and Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-780 Poznań, Poland.
Vinam PuriDepartment of Pharmaceutics, William Levine Hall, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Life Sciences Building, New Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3957-2378
Joanna Wrotyńska-BarczyńskaDivision of Infertility and Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 33 Polna St., 60-535 Poznań, Poland.
Bozena Michniak-KohnDepartment of Pharmaceutics, William Levine Hall, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Life Sciences Building, New Jersey Center for Biomaterials, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 778051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vagina has been considered a potential drug administration route for centuries. Most of the currently marketed and investigated vaginal formulations are composed with the use of natural or synthetic polymers having different functions in the product. The vaginal route is usually investigated as an administration site for topically acting active ingredients; however, the anatomical and physiological features of the vagina make it suitable also for drug systemic absorption. In this review, the most important natural and synthetic polymers used in vaginal products are summarized and described, with special attention paid to the properties important in terms of vaginal application. Moreover, the current knowledge on the commonly applied and innovative dosage forms designed for vaginal administration was presented. The aim of this work was to highlight the most recent research directions and indicate challenges related to vaginal drug administrations. As revealed in the literature overview, intravaginal products still gain enormous scientific attention, and novel polymers and formulations are still explored. However, there are research areas that require more extensive studies in order to provide the safety of novel vaginal products.

Indexed as

drug delivery systemsfilmsgelsmucoadhesionnanoparticlespatchespolymersvagina

Identifiers

PMID34203714
PMCPMC8232205
OpenAlexW3172141159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.