Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203680›Full record

ArticleMembranes2021

Improving the Performance of Composite Hollow Fiber Membranes with Magnetic Field Generated Convection Application on pH Correction.

Aurelia Cristina Nechifor, Alexandru Goran, Vlad-Alexandru Grosu, Constantin Bungău, Paul Constantin Albu, Alexandra Raluca Grosu, Ovidiu Oprea, Florentina Mihaela Păncescu, Gheorghe Nechifor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Membranes · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. pH and Design onMembranes · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aurelia Cristina NechiforAnalytical Chemistry and Environmental Engineering Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1-7 Polizu St., 011061 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru GoranAnalytical Chemistry and Environmental Engineering Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1-7 Polizu St., 011061 Bucharest, Romania.
Vlad-Alexandru GrosuDepartment of Electronic Technology and Reliability, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Information Technology, University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bd. Iuliu Maniu, nr. 1-3, 061071 București, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4263-7048
Constantin BungăuDepartment of Engineering and Management, Faculty of Management and Technological Engineering, University of Oradea, 410087 Oradea, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3793-6905
Paul Constantin AlbuIFIN Horia Hulubei, Radioisotopes and Radiation Metrology Department (DRMR), 30 Reactorului St., 023465 Măgurele, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-6082-830X
Alexandra Raluca GrosuAnalytical Chemistry and Environmental Engineering Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1-7 Polizu St., 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-6271-6456
Ovidiu OpreaDepartment of Inorganic Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1-7 Polizu St., 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8145-1094
Florentina Mihaela PăncescuAnalytical Chemistry and Environmental Engineering Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1-7 Polizu St., 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3414-2739
Gheorghe NechiforAnalytical Chemistry and Environmental Engineering Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 1-7 Polizu St., 011061 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7148-926X
Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București · ROHoria Hulubei National Institute for R and D in Physics and Nuclear Engineering · ROUniversity of Oradea · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The membranes and membrane processes have succeeded in the transition from major technological and biomedical applications to domestic applications: water recycling in washing machines, recycling of used cooking oil, recovery of gasoline vapors in the pumping stations or enrichment of air with oxygen. In this paper, the neutralization of condensation water and the retention of aluminum from thermal power plants is studied using ethylene propylene diene monomer sulfonated (EPDM-S) membranes containing magnetic particles impregnated in a microporous propylene hollow fiber (I-PPM) matrix. The obtained membranes were characterized from the morphological and structural points of view, using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high resolution SEM (HR-SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis (EDAX) and thermal gravimetric analyzer. The process performances (flow, selectivity) were studied using a variable magnetic field generated by electric coils. The results show the possibility of correcting the pH and removing aluminum ions from the condensation water of heating plants, during a winter period, without the intervention of any operator for the maintenance of the process. The pH was raised from an acidic one (2-4), to a slightly basic one (8-8.5), and the concentration of aluminum ions was lowered to the level allowed for discharge. Magnetic convection of the permeation module improves the pH correction process, but especially prevents the deposition of aluminum hydroxide on hollow fibers membranes.

Indexed as

aluminum retentionethylene propylene diene monomer sulfonateimpregnated membranesmagnetic convectionpH correctionpolypropylene hollow fibers

Identifiers

PMID34203680
PMCPMC8232166
OpenAlexW3172109939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.