Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203631›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Impact of the COVID-19 Self-Isolation Policy on the Occupations of Vulnerable Groups.

Amirudin Amirudin, Mariusz Urbański, Jumadil Saputra, Muhamad Deni Johansyah, Latip Latip, Ahmad Tarmizi, Teuku Afrizal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Socio-economic outcomes of COVID-19 on the marginalised: Who have taken the hardest hit?International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amirudin AmirudinFaculty of Humanities, Tembalang, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang 50275, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3041-0767
Mariusz UrbańskiFaculty of Civil Engineering, Częstochowa University of Technology, Akademicka 3, PL 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5808-5209
Jumadil SaputraFaculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu 21030, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-2919-5756
Muhamad Deni JohansyahFaculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Sumedang, West Java 45363, Indonesia.
Latip LatipSekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Dumai Selatan, Dumai, Riau 28826, Indonesia.
Ahmad TarmiziFaculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Islam Riau, Pekanbaru, Riau 28284, Indonesia.
Teuku AfrizalFaculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Jawa Tengah 50275, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Today, the spread of the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to impact on world public health and bring about considerable human suffering partly due to government policies on reducing the spread. COVID-19 has significantly affected human health and it has impacted on the occupation of vulnerable groups such as tour guides, drivers and shop assistants. Of these, the present study aims to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 self-isolation policy on the occupation of vulnerable groups in Semarang City, Indonesia. To achieve this objective, this study uses a qualitative method with an ethnography approach considering a rational or non-rational thinking model. The binary opposition thinking pattern pioneered by Lévi-Strauss was used in the interview process with 25 informants in Semarang City, Indonesia. The data analyzed the response pattern of informants through the taxonomy analysis. Three levels of vulnerability among groups relating to occupation were identified; jobs lost, income decreased, and delayed salary. The result of the analysis found that the group who obeyed self-isolation was categorized as a rational thinking; these groups stay at home, do not go to work, and have no income. Besides that, the group who ignored self-isolation is categorized as non-rational thinking; they work, as usual, get their salary, and believe that the COVID-19 pandemic is a disaster and they pray for their safety to God. In conclusion, COVID-19 brings a significant impact on occupation in the forms of postponing, declining, and missing income besides the health effects among vulnerable groups in Semarang city, Indonesia. In avoiding COVID-19 infection, the circumstances of vulnerable groups are worse when self-isolation is required. Thus, this study suggests that the government needs to assist vulnerable groups by focusing on strategic policies, such as strategies for survival, providing access to basic needs, including health, and offering livelihood plans by providing access to medical services and other source of income.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansIndonesiaOccupationsPolicySARS-CoV-2coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemicoccupationalrational and non-rational thinking modelself-isolation policyvulnerable groups

Identifiers

PMID34203631
PMCPMC8296265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.