Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203551›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Pharmacokinetics, Biodistribution, and Biosafety of PEGylated Gold Nanoparticles In Vivo.

Katarina Kozics, Monika Sramkova, Kristina Kopecka, Patricia Begerova, Alena Manova, Zora Krivosikova, Zuzana Sevcikova, Aurelia Liskova, Eva Rollerova, Tibor Dubaj and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Nanoparticle radiosensitizers in cancer radiotherapy: bridging preclinical promise and clinical reality.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Materials today. Bio · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Katarina KozicsDepartment of Nanobiology, Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center SAS, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Monika SramkovaDepartment of Nanobiology, Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center SAS, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Kristina KopeckaDepartment of Nanobiology, Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center SAS, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Patricia BegerovaDepartment of Nanobiology, Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center SAS, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Alena ManovaInstitute of Analytical Chemistry, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Zora KrivosikovaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacotherapy, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, 833 03 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Zuzana SevcikovaDepartment of Morphological Disciplines, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia.
Aurelia LiskovaLaboratory of Immunotoxicology, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, 833 03 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Eva RollerovaLaboratory of Toxicology, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, 833 03 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Tibor DubajInstitute of Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Victor PuntesCatalan Institute of Nanotechnology, UAB Campus, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Ladislava WsolovaLaboratory of Toxicology, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, 833 03 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Peter SimonInstitute of Physical Chemistry and Chemical Physics, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 812 37 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-2828-4151
Jana TulinskaLaboratory of Immunotoxicology, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, 833 03 Bratislava, Slovakia.
Alena GabelovaDepartment of Nanobiology, Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center SAS, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-2674-2737
Cancer Research Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences · SKSlovak Medical University · SKSlovak University of Technology in Bratislava · SKInstitut Català de Nanociència i Nanotecnologia · ESUniversity of Veterinary Medicine in Košice · SK

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement 685817European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement 857381Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV 2/0055/20Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV 2/0121/21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the obvious advantages of gold nanoparticles for biomedical applications, controversial and incomplete toxicological data hamper their widespread use. Here, we present the results from an in vivo toxicity study using gold nanoparticles coated with polyethylene glycol (PEG-AuNPs). The pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of PEG-AuNPs were examined in the rat's liver, lung, spleen, and kidney after a single i.v. injection (0.7 mg/kg) at different time intervals. PEG-AuNPs had a relatively long blood circulation time and accumulated primarily in the liver and spleen, where they remained for up to 28 days after administration. Increased cytoplasmic vacuolation in hepatocytes 24 h and 7 days after PEG-AuNPs exposure and apoptotic-like cells in white splenic pulp 24 h after administration has been detected, however, 28 days post-exposure were no longer observed. In contrast, at this time point, we identified significant changes in lipid metabolism, altered levels of liver injury markers, and elevated monocyte count, but without marked biological relevance. In blood cells, no DNA damage was present in any of the studied time intervals, with the exception of DNA breakage transiently detected in primary kidney cells 4 h post-injection. Our results indicate that the tissue accumulation of PEG-AuNPs might result in late toxic effects.

Indexed as

biodistributionclinical chemistrygold nanoparticleshematologyhistopathologypharmacokineticsrats

Identifiers

PMID34203551
PMCPMC8305691
OpenAlexW3174324209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.