Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203529›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Psychological Support Interventions for Healthcare Providers and Informal Caregivers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Vanessa Bertuzzi, Michelle Semonella, Denise Bruno, Chiara Manna, Julian Edbrook-Childs, Emanuele M Giusti, Gianluca Castelnuovo, Giada Pietrabissa

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Patterns of Online Stress Management Information-Seeking Behavior in Hungary.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vanessa BertuzziDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8541-5357
Michelle SemonellaDepartment of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel.
Denise BrunoDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, 20123 Milan, Italy.
Chiara MannaDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4013-185X
Julian Edbrook-ChildsEvidence-Based Practices Unit, University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London N1 6EB, UK.
Emanuele M GiustiDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5767-8785
Gianluca CastelnuovoDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2633-9822
Giada PietrabissaDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5911-5748
University of Milan · ITAnna Freud Centre · GBBar-Ilan University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare providers and informal caregivers were at an increased risk of adverse mental health effects. This systematic review provides a summary of the available evidence on the content and efficacy of the psychological support interventions in increasing mental health among healthcare providers and informal caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsPubMed, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, and Scopus databases were systematically searched for relevant articles, and the methodological quality of selected articles was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies.

resultsA search of electronic databases identified five reports based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. All psychological support interventions for caregivers were delivered digitally. Despite the large heterogeneity of the selected studies, the findings support the efficacy of mental health interventions in reducing distress and burnout, while promoting self-efficacy and well-being in both healthcare providers and informal caregivers.

conclusionSince mental health problems are expected to increase during, and as a result of, the COVID-19 pandemic, and digital tools might offer a range of mental health treatments to meet the unique and immediate needs of people, further research is needed to test the cost-effectiveness of digital psychological interventions.

Indexed as

CaregiversCOVID-19Health PersonnelHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2clinical psychologyCOVID-19digital psychological interventionhealthcare providersinformal caregiverpsychological support intervention

Identifiers

PMID34203529
PMCPMC8297206
OpenAlexW3174669183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.