Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203365›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Recent Advances in Salivary Scintigraphic Evaluation of Salivary Gland Function.

Yen-Chun Chen, Hsin-Yung Chen, Chung-Huei Hsu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cancer therapy-related salivary dysfunction.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  11. Ferroptosis in organ fibrosis: From mechanisms to therapeutic medicines.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Dynamic Salivary Gland Scintigraphy: Establishing Normative Data through a Healthy Cohort.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yen-Chun ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-9340-7357
Hsin-Yung ChenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Chung-Huei HsuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Taipei Medical University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saliva plays an important role in supporting upper gastrointestinal tract function and oral well-being. Salivary dysfunction mainly manifests with a decrease in salivary flow. Among varieties of quantitative methods, salivary scintigraphy is a relatively noninvasive, well-tolerated, reproducible, and objective approach for functional evaluation of salivary disorders, yet the lack of precise quantitative reference values and no standardized protocol limit its generalized utilization. In this article, we review the scintigraphic performance between the visual analysis and quantitative methods in predicting Sjögren's syndrome and verify the potential aspects of the application in interpreting different disease entities and phases of functional salivary disorders.

Indexed as

functional evaluationquantitativesalivary scintigraphySjögren’s syndromevisual analysis

Identifiers

PMID34203365
PMCPMC8305115
OpenAlexW3174203614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.