Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203325›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Translation and Linguistic Validation of Outcome Instruments for Traumatic Brain Injury Research and Clinical Practice: A Step-by-Step Approach within the Observational CENTER-TBI Study.

Nicole von Steinbuechel, Katrin Rauen, Ugne Krenz, Yi-Jhen Wu, Amra Covic, Anne Marie Plass, Katrin Cunitz, Isabelle Mueller, Fabian Bockhop, Suzanne Polinder and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Nicole von SteinbuechelInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Katrin RauenDepartment of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatric Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Minervastrasse 145, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4555-6697
Ugne KrenzInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Yi-Jhen WuInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Amra CovicInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Anne Marie PlassInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7801-9655
Katrin CunitzInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5530-8190
Isabelle MuellerInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7511-6647
Fabian BockhopInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
Suzanne PolinderDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lindsay WilsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4113-2328
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrew I R MaasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1612-1264
David MenonDivision of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Box 157, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Marina ZeldovichInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0172-9904
The Linguistic Validation Group Of Center-Tbi
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEErasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Hannelore Kohl Stiftung (Germany)Integra LifeSciences Corporation (USA)OneMind (USA)Seventh Framework Programme 602150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing outcomes in multinational studies on traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses major challenges and requires relevant instruments in languages other than English. Of the 19 outcome instruments selected for use in the observational Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study, 17 measures lacked translations in at least one target language. To fill this gap, we aimed to develop well-translated linguistically and psychometrically validated instruments. We performed translations and linguistic validations of patient-reported measures (PROMs), clinician-reported (ClinRO), and performance-based (PerfO) outcome instruments, using forward and backward translations, reconciliations, cognitive debriefings with up to 10 participants, iterative revisions, and international harmonization with input from over 150 international collaborators. In total, 237 translations and 211 linguistic validations were carried out in up to 20 languages. Translations were evaluated at the linguistic and cultural level by coding changes when the original versions are compared with subsequent translation steps, using the output of cognitive debriefings, and using comprehension rates. The average comprehension rate per instrument varied from 88% to 98%, indicating a good quality of the translations. These outcome instruments provide a solid basis for future TBI research and clinical practice and allow the aggregation and analysis of data across different countries and languages.

Indexed as

linguistic validationoutcome instrumentstranslationtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID34203325
PMCPMC8269004
OpenAlexW3173454953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.