Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34203298›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

Biosynthesis of Bacterial Cellulose by Extended Cultivation with Multiple Removal of BC Pellicles.

Ekaterina A Skiba, Nadezhda A Shavyrkina, Vera V Budaeva, Anastasia E Sitnikova, Anna A Korchagina, Nikolay V Bychin, Evgenia K Gladysheva, Igor N Pavlov, Andrey N Zharikov, Vladimir G Lubyansky and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ekaterina A SkibaInstitute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCET SB RAS), 659322 Biysk, Altai Krai, Russia.
Nadezhda A ShavyrkinaInstitute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCET SB RAS), 659322 Biysk, Altai Krai, Russia.
Vera V BudaevaInstitute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCET SB RAS), 659322 Biysk, Altai Krai, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1628-0815
Anastasia E SitnikovaInstitute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCET SB RAS), 659322 Biysk, Altai Krai, Russia.
Anna A KorchaginaInstitute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCET SB RAS), 659322 Biysk, Altai Krai, Russia.
Nikolay V BychinInstitute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCET SB RAS), 659322 Biysk, Altai Krai, Russia.
Evgenia K GladyshevaInstitute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCET SB RAS), 659322 Biysk, Altai Krai, Russia.
Igor N PavlovInstitute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCET SB RAS), 659322 Biysk, Altai Krai, Russia.
Andrey N ZharikovChair of Neymark Departmental Surgery and Hospital Surgery, Altai State Medical University, 656038 Barnaul, Altai Krai, Russia.
Vladimir G LubyanskyChair of Neymark Departmental Surgery and Hospital Surgery, Altai State Medical University, 656038 Barnaul, Altai Krai, Russia.
Elena N SemyonovaAnatomic Pathology Department, Altai Krai Clinical Hospital, 656024 Barnaul, Altai Krai, Russia.
Gennady V SakovichInstitute for Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IPCET SB RAS), 659322 Biysk, Altai Krai, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 17-19-01054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended cultivation with multiple removal of BC pellicles is proposed herein as a new biosynthetic process for bacterial cellulose (BC). This method enhances the BC surface area by 5-11 times per unit volume of the growth medium, improving the economic efficiency of biosynthesis. The resultant BC gel-films were thin, transparent, and congruent. The degree of polymerization (DP) and elastic modulus (EM) depended on the number of BC pellicle removals, vessel shape, and volume. The quality of BC from removals II-III to VII was better than from removal I. The process scale-up of 1:40 by volume increased DP by 1.5 times and EM by 5 times. A fact was established that the symbiotic

Indexed as

bacterial celluloseextended cultivationhernioplastypellicle removal

Identifiers

PMID34203298
PMCPMC8271380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.