ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2021
Early Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone, and Thiamine Treatment for Septic Cardiomyopathy: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Investigation of Sevoflurane-Induced Apoptotic Damage in Human Cardiomyocytes and the Protective Efficacy of Ascorbic Acid.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive insights into sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction through proteomics and metabolomics.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Therapeutical progress in sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Cardiac Arrhythmias: Pathophysiology and Implications for Novel Therapeutic Approaches.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Seven-day and In-hospital Mortality According to Left and Right Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Septic Shock.Korean circulation journal · 2023Article
- Research Progress on the Mechanism and Management of Septic Cardiomyopathy: A Comprehensive Review.Emergency medicine international · 2023Review
- The cross-sectional relationship between vitamin C and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels: insights from NHANES database.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Aging and its treatment with vitamin C: a comprehensive mechanistic review.Molecular biology reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of early vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine among patients with septic cardiomyopathy. In total, 91 patients with septic cardiomyopathy received a vitamin C protocol in September 2018-February 2020. These patients were compared to 75 patients with septic cardiomyopathy who did not receive a vitamin C protocol in September 2016-February 2018. Relative to the control patients, the treated patients were older and more likely to require mechanical ventilation. The vitamin C protocol was associated with a lower risk of intensive care unit mortality in the propensity score (PS)-matched cohort (aHR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.30-0.99) and inverse probability of treatment weighting-matched cohort (aHR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.45-1.00). In the PS-matched cohort (59 patients per group), the vitamin C protocol was associated with decreased values for vasopressor dosage, C-reactive protein concentration, and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score during the 4-day treatment period. Patients who started the vitamin C protocol within 2 h after diagnosis (vs. 2-8 h or ≥8 h) had the highest vasopressor weaning rate and the lowest mortality rate. These results suggest that early treatment using a vitamin C protocol might improve organ dysfunction and reduce mortality among patients with septic cardiomyopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.